clickjacking

clickjacking is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge. It costs 47 tokens per session (1,253 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of clickjacking, MIT.

A clickjacking testing playbook: clickjacking is an attack that places an invisible website control over a misleading button so a user activates the wrong action. It covers framing checks, browser headers, and several attack patterns.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to test iframe protections, inspect X-Frame-Options and CSP settings, and assess multi-step or drag-and-drop clickjacking scenarios.
Why use it?
It helps security testers identify when a page can be embedded and whether that weakness could affect administrative or other sensitive actions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to test iframe protections, inspect X-Frame-Options and CSP settings, and assess multi-step or drag-and-drop clickjacking scenarios.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/clickjacking
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge --skill clickjacking
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for clickjacking

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/clickjacking/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/clickjacking)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/clickjacking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/clickjacking/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for clickjacking

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/clickjacking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/clickjacking.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,253 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00047 $0.01253
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00626
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00251
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00125

Measured 6d ago against content hash e8d576fea77e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

clickjacking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to clickjacking — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/curated/clickjacking/SKILL.md · 164 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

SKILL: Clickjacking — Expert Attack Playbook

AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Clickjacking (UI redress) techniques. Covers iframe transparency tricks, X-Frame-Options bypass, CSP frame-ancestors, multi-step clickjacking, drag-and-drop attacks, and chaining with other vulnerabilities. Often a "low severity" finding that becomes critical when targeting admin actions.

1. CORE CONCEPT

Clickjacking loads a target page in a transparent iframe overlaid on an attacker's page. The victim sees the attacker's UI but clicks on the invisible target page, performing unintended actions.

<style>
  iframe { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; opacity: 0.0001; z-index: 2; }
  .decoy { position: absolute; top: 200px; left: 100px; z-index: 1; }
</style>
<div class="decoy"><button>Click to win a prize!</button></div>
<iframe src="https://target.com/account/delete?confirm=yes"></iframe>

2. DETECTION — IS THE PAGE FRAMEABLE?

Check X-Frame-Options Header

X-Frame-Options: DENY           → cannot be framed (secure)
X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN     → only same-origin framing (secure for cross-origin)
X-Frame-Options: ALLOW-FROM uri → deprecated, browser support inconsistent
(header absent)                  → frameable! (vulnerable)

Check CSP frame-ancestors

Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'none'        → cannot be framed
Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self'         → same-origin only
Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors https://a.com  → specific origin
(directive absent)                                       → frameable

CSP frame-ancestors supersedes X-Frame-Options in modern browsers.

Quick PoC Test

<iframe src="https://target.com/sensitive-action" width="800" height="600"></iframe>

If the page loads in the iframe → frameable → potentially vulnerable.

JavaScript Frame Detection (from target page source)

// Common frame-busting code found in target pages:
if (top.location.hostname !== self.location.hostname) {
    top.location.href = self.location.href;
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 164 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 164 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A e8d576fea77e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

clickjacking is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge (22 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,253 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to clickjacking, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories