Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/yaklang/hack-skills/clickjackingnpx skills add yaklang/hack-skills --skill clickjackinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.01253 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00626 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00251 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
clickjacking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- clickjacking — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- clickjacking — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- clickjacking — 94% identical, 4 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SKILL: Clickjacking — Expert Attack Playbook
AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Clickjacking (UI redress) techniques. Covers iframe transparency tricks, X-Frame-Options bypass, CSP frame-ancestors, multi-step clickjacking, drag-and-drop attacks, and chaining with other vulnerabilities. Often a "low severity" finding that becomes critical when targeting admin actions.
1. CORE CONCEPT
Clickjacking loads a target page in a transparent iframe overlaid on an attacker's page. The victim sees the attacker's UI but clicks on the invisible target page, performing unintended actions.
<style>
iframe { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; opacity: 0.0001; z-index: 2; }
.decoy { position: absolute; top: 200px; left: 100px; z-index: 1; }
</style>
<div class="decoy"><button>Click to win a prize!</button></div>
<iframe src="https://target.com/account/delete?confirm=yes"></iframe>
2. DETECTION — IS THE PAGE FRAMEABLE?
Check X-Frame-Options Header
X-Frame-Options: DENY → cannot be framed (secure)
X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN → only same-origin framing (secure for cross-origin)
X-Frame-Options: ALLOW-FROM uri → deprecated, browser support inconsistent
(header absent) → frameable! (vulnerable)
Check CSP frame-ancestors
Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'none' → cannot be framed
Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self' → same-origin only
Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors https://a.com → specific origin
(directive absent) → frameable
CSP frame-ancestors supersedes X-Frame-Options in modern browsers.
Quick PoC Test
<iframe src="https://target.com/sensitive-action" width="800" height="600"></iframe>
If the page loads in the iframe → frameable → potentially vulnerable.
JavaScript Frame Detection (from target page source)
// Common frame-busting code found in target pages:
if (top.location.hostname !== self.location.hostname) {
top.location.href = self.location.href;
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 164 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A e8d576fea77e
clickjacking is a skill published in the GitHub repository yaklang/hack-skills (2,004 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,253 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…