Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sidiangongyuan/codex-skills-library --skill experiment-plannergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sidiangongyuan/codex-skills-libraryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sidiangongyuan/codex-skills-library/experiment-planner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sidiangongyuan/codex-skills-library/experiment-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sidiangongyuan/codex-skills-library/experiment-planner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sidiangongyuan/codex-skills-library/experiment-planner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sidiangongyuan/codex-skills-library/experiment-planner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.02655 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01327 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00531 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00265 |
Grade A, and why
experiment-planner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 233 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Experiment Planner
Overview
Use this skill when the user needs to explore a research idea, continue an authorized experiment workflow, or accept and interpret results. It turns claims into a testable story and experiment plan. It is an adapter over existing research-agent ideas, not a replacement for the user's writing, review, rebuttal, figure, evidence, or GitHub release skills.
Core Boundaries
- Default domain: general deep learning and computer science research. Adapt to collaborative perception, 3D perception, or autonomous driving only when the task context calls for it.
- For discussion-only planning, keep output in chat unless the user asks for a
saved artifact. When the user asks to implement or run experiments in a
repository, persist the pre-run result contract: update the paper's final
LaTeX tables when a manuscript is in scope; otherwise update the existing
experiment-planning document or create
experiment-plan.mdat the repository root. - Do not launch long experiments, deploy GPU jobs, modify code, or retry failed runs unless the user explicitly asks for execution or a still-valid approval covers the ordinary continuation. A bounded same-config recovery stays within that approval; do not silently expand its scope.
- Do not replace
paper-section-playbook,paper-refinement-skills,paper-review-panel,rebuttal-response-skills,paper-visual-craft, orgithub-project-release; hand off to them only after the research plan or results are ready. - Treat external projects as references, not installed dependencies. Read
references/source-map.mdbefore discussing provenance or upgrading this skill from upstream sources. - During approved execution, a still-valid earlier user authorization covers ordinary implementation, local bug fixes, queueing in-scope runs, and evaluation. It does not authorize a new experiment family, dataset, seed policy, or paper-only TODO; those remain explicit opt-ins.
Entry Modes
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +93 lines · -3 tokens per session 0c1281e660c6
- 10d ago First seen · 140 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 121b1ff348e2
experiment-planner is a skill published in the GitHub repository sidiangongyuan/codex-skills-library (8 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 2,655 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
latchbio-integration
Build, register, debug, and operate bioinformatics workflows on Latch using the Python SDK, CLI, Latch Data and Registry, Nextflow, Snakemake, programmatic execution, and Latch MCP. Use when authoring or deploying Latch workflows, configuring resources or interfaces, moving data, integrating Registry, or launching and…
pubmed-database
Direct PubMed and NCBI E-utilities search workflows for biomedical literature, MeSH queries, PMID lookup, citation retrieval, and API-backed literature monitoring. Use when a task needs biomedical literature from PubMed rather than general web search.
zeroplot
Create editable charts, diagrams, figures, posters, or slides from intent, data, or references.
pathway-enrichment
Run pathway and gene-set enrichment analysis on gene lists or ranked gene data, then interpret the results. Use whenever the user has a set of genes (differentially expressed genes from PyDESeq2/Scanpy, CRISPR-screen hits, cluster marker genes, proteomics hits) and wants to know which biological pathways, GO terms, or…
polars-bio
High-performance genomic interval operations and bioinformatics file I/O on Polars DataFrames. Overlap, nearest, merge, coverage, complement, subtract for BED/VCF/BAM/GFF intervals. Streaming, cloud-native, faster bioframe alternative.
scientific-visualization
Create and audit truthful, accessible, publication-ready scientific figures with Matplotlib, Seaborn, or Plotly. Use for figure design, multi-panel layouts, uncertainty and missing-data displays, color/contrast review, image metadata validation, and journal export planning.