Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-harness-constructionnpx skills add sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc --skill agent-harness-constructiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-harness-construction)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-harness-construction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-harness-construction.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00418 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00209 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
agent-harness-construction scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to agent-harness-construction — 26 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Agent Harness Construction
Use this skill when you are improving how an agent plans, calls tools, recovers from errors, and converges on completion.
Core Model
Agent output quality is constrained by:
- Action space quality
- Observation quality
- Recovery quality
- Context budget quality
Action Space Design
- Use stable, explicit tool names.
- Keep inputs schema-first and narrow.
- Return deterministic output shapes.
- Avoid catch-all tools unless isolation is impossible.
Granularity Rules
- Use micro-tools for high-risk operations (deploy, migration, permissions).
- Use medium tools for common edit/read/search loops.
- Use macro-tools only when round-trip overhead is the dominant cost.
Observation Design
Every tool response should include:
status: success|warning|errorsummary: one-line resultnext_actions: actionable follow-upsartifacts: file paths / IDs
Error Recovery Contract
For every error path, include:
- root cause hint
- safe retry instruction
- explicit stop condition
Context Budgeting
- Keep system prompt minimal and invariant.
- Move large guidance into skills loaded on demand.
- Prefer references to files over inlining long documents.
- Compact at phase boundaries, not arbitrary token thresholds.
Architecture Pattern Guidance
- ReAct: best for exploratory tasks with uncertain path.
- Function-calling: best for structured deterministic flows.
- Hybrid (recommended): ReAct planning + typed tool execution.
Benchmarking
Track:
- completion rate
- retries per task
- pass@1 and pass@3
- cost per successful task
Anti-Patterns
- Too many tools with overlapping semantics.
- Opaque tool output with no recovery hints.
- Error-only output without next steps.
- Context overloading with irrelevant references.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 74 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 8da8d0cd5ab9
agent-harness-construction is a skill published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 418 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to agent-harness-construction, differing in 26 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
foolproof-product
Use this skill on ANY code change in codevira's product surface (mcpserver/, indexer/). Triggers on Edit/Write to product code, on phrases like "fix bug", "add feature", "handle error", or any modification to commands the end-user runs. Enforces 10 product- reliability principles: no silent failures, atomic state…
epistemic-honesty
Use this skill whenever you're about to (1) make a definitive claim like "this works", "tests pass", "ready to ship", "fixed", "done"; or (2) propose a solution to a problem; or (3) diagnose a bug or issue. Forces explicit confidence calibration with inline evidence, surfaces what you don't know, and demands a…
open-source-quality
Use this skill before committing, pushing, or opening a PR. Triggers on phrases like "commit", "git commit", "push", "open PR", "create pull request", "finalize this change". Enforces conventional commit messages, atomic commits, code style (ruff/mypy), public-API docstrings, actionable error messages, changelog…
release-readiness
Use this skill whenever the conversation mentions releasing, shipping, publishing, promoting to PyPI, "ship it", "release X.Y.Z", "ready to release", "let's publish", or any phrase suggesting moving codevira to production. Walks the 5-gate release gauntlet (G1-G5) and refuses to proceed without evidence at every gate.…
development-discipline
Use this skill before ANY code-writing tool call (Edit, Write, NotebookEdit) on this project. Triggers on phrases like "implement", "fix bug", "add feature", "refactor", "create function", "modify file", or whenever the user asks for a code change. Forces a 4-step CONTEXT → PURPOSE → REASON → CODE sequence with…
practical-coding
Use for implementing, fixing, refactoring, or reviewing code with the smallest correct change; routes only unresolved debugging, architecture/choice, or risk-boundary blockers, while code retrieval uses the cheapest sufficient available capability.