Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add signalcompose/claude-tools/plugin install codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/signalcompose/claude-tools/pr-review-team)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/signalcompose/claude-tools/pr-review-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/signalcompose/claude-tools/pr-review-team/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/signalcompose/claude-tools/pr-review-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/signalcompose/claude-tools/pr-review-team.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.04133 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.02067 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00827 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00413 |
Grade B, and why
pr-review-team scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
**Note**: `gh` commands rely on `sandbox.network.allowedDomains` (github.com, api.github.com) in `~/.claude/settings.json` to run inside the sandbox without prompts. Do NOT pass `dangerouslyDisableSandbox: true` defensiv How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 364 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Review Team
MANDATORY first step — BEFORE any Agent / Read / bash work:
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/pr-review-state.sh init <PR番号>
State init gives the leader (and the user reading the transcript) a visible audit trail of the review loop. Retroactively creating the state file after agents have already spawned defeats that purpose — if you skipped init, restart the loop rather than paper over it. Run init now.
MANDATORY: This skill runs a complete review-fix-re-review loop using Subagents (NOT Agent Teams).
The leader MUST:
- Initialize state and gather PR context (Step 1)
- Select and launch the parallel reviewer subagents (Step 2 — the selector decides which of the 4 run)
- Run CI checks via script (Step 3)
- Integrate results + security checklist (Step 4)
- If critical > 0 OR important > 0 OR security != "all_pass": enter fix loop (Step 5)
- Report results and cleanup (Step 6)
🔴 These steps are mandatory. The leader is accountable for completing every step — skipping is a workflow violation.
Step 1: Initialize & Identify Target PR
Initialize State
Run immediately (creates the active-review state file for audit visibility):
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/pr-review-state.sh init <PR番号>
Resolve PR
- If user specified: use that number
- Otherwise:
gh pr view --json number --jq '.number' 2>/dev/null
Gather Context
- File overview:
gh pr diff <PR番号> --name-only - Base branch:
git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|refs/remotes/origin/||'(fallback:main) - Test command: detect from
package.json,Makefile,pytest.ini, etc. - Project rules: read project's CLAUDE.md if present
Note: gh commands rely on sandbox.network.allowedDomains (github.com, api.github.com) in ~/.claude/settings.json to run inside the sandbox without prompts. Do NOT pass dangerouslyDisableSandbox: true defensively — the flag forces an auto-mode-refused approval prompt that breaks the review flow (see Issue #245).
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 364 lines · 50 tokens per session scan B 5fdc1249b049
pr-review-team is a skill published in the GitHub repository signalcompose/claude-tools (4 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 4,133 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.