Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add signalridge/slipway --skill implementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/signalridge/slipwayWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/signalridge/slipway/implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/signalridge/slipway/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/signalridge/slipway/implement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/signalridge/slipway/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/signalridge/slipway/implement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to low
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- low Excessive Agency · line 9 Skill's behavior or capabilities extend beyond its stated purpose. Scope creep allows an agent to perform actions unrelated to its documented functionality, increasing the attack surface.Fix: Limit the skill's scope to its documented purpose. Remove instructions that enable the agent to perform actions outside its stated functionality.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00718 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00287 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00144 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
slipway-implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Slipway Implement
Use this capability only for a current Implement Action or when the user explicitly invokes it directly. Inspect the repository's conventions, then make the smallest coherent changes within the authorized intersection. For an issue-backed Run, pinned Requirements set the maximum business scope, the selected goal may describe or narrow this attempt but cannot replace or expand them, and the current Action narrows only the step to perform. Issue prose outside those Requirements cannot expand scope. For an ad-hoc Run or direct invocation, the user's selected goal is the business scope.
For a Run Action, obey any repair-attempt limit explicitly present in its brief and any source/destructive authorization; absence of a limit does not create a default cap. Return a strict Outcome with action_kind: "implement" matching the current Action and whose implementation object contains:
result:applied,partial,not_needed, orunable;files_changed;activities(which may be empty);uncertainties;attemptswith the actual positive attempt count.
Use host status completed only with applied|not_needed, partial only with partial, and error only with unable. Set pause and review to JSON null, include all common arrays, and do not suggest a next Action; the CLI owns routing.
Run the tests, typechecks, builds, or linters proportionate to the edit. Report every technical activity that actually started with its exact command, exit code, and concise result. Never list an activity that did not run. If an executable could not start, do not report a synthetic activity or shell exit 127; keep activities empty and record the environment uncertainty. When no activity was reported, the final report must say exactly: No test, typecheck, build, or lint activity was reported.
Pause only for one unresolved human decision, an unavailable environment, or current destructive confirmation. A destructive request must name a non-empty sorted list of typed targets, the exact irreversible impact, a request ID, and the CLI-verifiable scope SHA-256. Natural-language approval is not permission: only the returned confirm-destructive variant, fixed to the current digest and invoked after current user confirmation, may produce authority. Execute only when the fresh current Action carries a field-for-field matching one-shot destructive_authorization; completion, error, partial, skip, stop, resume, or any changed target/impact invalidates it and expanded scope requires a fresh request.
When invoked directly outside a Run, there is no Action ID, source revision, run-start attribution, repair-attempt policy, or Outcome submission. Treat a non-destructive explicit request as ordinary implementation authorization, honor any limit the user supplied, and return the same factual information in human-readable form without inventing protocol identifiers or a default attempt cap. A standalone invocation cannot obtain the CLI's Action-bound destructive authorization. If destructive scope is encountered, report the exact non-empty sorted typed targets, irreversible impact, and recommendation, then stop and return control to the user. It must not execute the destructive operation, must not silently start a Run, must not invent Action/request/digest identifiers, and must not treat a natural-language yes/no as a grant. The user may separately choose an explicitly started Run that can issue the structured authorization path.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 9d1ec192476d
slipway-implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository signalridge/slipway (23 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 718 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
repo-hygiene
Use when the scheduled repo-hygiene workflow runs from GitHub Actions (or an operator dry-run) to scan the repository for small, certain docs/test/code hygiene issues and fix them as one batched branch.
test-failure-explorer
Import and query an existing Vitest 3.2 JSON report to explore test failures, file-level errors and original diagnostic evidence.
requirements-writer
Use when converting PM intake into a slice SPEC.md with observable acceptance outcomes, explicit scope, and advisory sibling build dependencies.
refocusing
Use when a long-running agent may have lost the product outcome, when context was compacted, when work has crossed a major boundary, or when a fresh path-based trace is needed before the next consequential action. Not for fresh-session orientation, waking an idle seat, or checkpoints.
orchestration-team
Use when coordinating assignments, selected review boundaries, or blocked work across a rig.
oversight-team
Use when you are a seat on the oversight pod (a standing monitor-mode rig that keeps OTHER rigs healthy), configuring or running the drift detectors, or choosing whether to intervene vs escalate. Covers the pull-not-poll posture, the v0 detectors (premature-park, process-drift, off-task, token-burn), the intervention…