AIDocxWorkFlow: Skill for Claude Code

.cursor/skills/aidocx-s7-review/SKILL.md

aidocx-s7-review is a skill for Claude Code, Cursor from SilenceInsect/AIDocxWorkFlow. It costs 150 tokens per session (8,935 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review process for test cases, where test cases describe checks used to verify software behavior. It compares those checks with earlier test points and business-flow documents, using a defined set of eight project areas.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing AIDocxWorkFlow Stage 6 test cases, checking their structure and coverage, and producing review recommendations or a failure report when required materials are missing.
Why use it?
It helps identify missing coverage and incorrect classifications before testing work is accepted.

Skill for Claude CodeCursor

Written for Claude Code and Cursor: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter, but also installed under .cursor/. Also seen: mentions Claude Code; mentions Codex; mentions Cursor.

This is SilenceInsect/AIDocxWorkFlow's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Cursor how to work on AIDocxWorkFlow itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything AIDocxWorkFlow configures →

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is ⚠️ **模块定义见 [`.cursor/MODULES.md`](../../../MODULES.md)(项目级唯一真相源)。**.

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to SilenceInsect/AIDocxWorkFlow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SilenceInsect/AIDocxWorkFlow/main/.cursor/skills/aidocx-s7-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SilenceInsect/AIDocxWorkFlow

Made for: Claude Code, Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for aidocx-s7-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/silenceinsect/aidocxworkflow/aidocx-s7-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/silenceinsect/aidocxworkflow/aidocx-s7-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/silenceinsect/aidocxworkflow/aidocx-s7-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/silenceinsect/aidocxworkflow/aidocx-s7-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for aidocx-s7-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/silenceinsect/aidocxworkflow/aidocx-s7-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/silenceinsect/aidocxworkflow/aidocx-s7-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 150 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 8,935 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00150 $0.08935
Opus 5 $0.00075 $0.04467
Sonnet 5 $0.00030 $0.01787
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00894

Measured 10d ago against content hash 81934525d8cf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

aidocx-s7-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/skills/aidocx-s7-review/SKILL.md · 666 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 666 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

AIDocxWorkFlow S7 — 用例审查

独立阶段:可单独调用。上游材料(S6 test_cases.json + coverage/omission 账本)审查合格后开始,失败写失败报告。

⚠️ 模块定义见 .cursor/MODULES.md(项目级唯一真相源)。 本文件不重写模块表。所有"模块"字段取值集合见 MODULES.md §1 总表,{Module} 占位符 实际取值集合 = 8 模块之一(CONFIG / UI / BIZ / UTIL / LINK / LOG / SPECIAL / HINT)。

HINT vs UI 边界判定(误标高发区)见 MODULES.md §4.11.2


阶段入口

触发/aidocx-s7-review 或粘贴 S6 test_cases.json

前置材料:S6 test_cases.json + S5 test_points.json + S4 business_flow.md + coverage_ledger.json + omission_ledger.json。详见 §1.4。

材料缺失时:生成失败报告,停止 S7。


§1.4 必读材料与违规认定

⚠️ 违反本节禁令 → 产出不合格,必须补读后重新生成。

违规认定(满足任一 → 产出不合格)

  • ❌ 未读取本节材料,直接凭印象生成
  • ❌ 跳过标注"强制"的材料,用其他来源替代
  • ❌ 产出的 module / s4_reference 与材料内容明显不符
  • ❌ 用"业务常识"替代必须读取的材料

必读材料清单

审查前,必须先 Read 以下材料。

# 材料 路径 必读原因
8 模块总表 .cursor/MODULES.md(§1 总表) 覆盖率按模块统计;审查员 B 的 module_coverage 以 8 模块为分母
模块边界区分 .cursor/MODULES.md(§4 各模块 O_boundary.md) 判断 TP 模块归属是否正确;HINT vs UI 是最高误标区
S6 test_cases(强制) workflow_assets/<req_name>/<version>/「S6 测试用例生成」/test_cases.json 审查对象;未读取 → 无法审查
S5 test_points(强制) workflow_assets/<req_name>/<version>/「S5 测试点生成」/test_points.json S4 风险点覆盖率对比基准
S4 business_flow(强制) workflow_assets/<req_name>/<version>/「S4 流程图导出」/business_flow.md S7 覆盖率指标 = S4 风险点全量覆盖(100%)是硬约束

§1.6 强制写文件(不可跳过,禁止询问)

S7 审查的产出是文件,不是对话窗口内的文字。

执行顺序(强制)

步骤 1:调用 auto_reviewer.snapshot() 获取事实数字(不可跳过)
  ↓
步骤 2:LLM 读取 snap 输出,做语义审查
  ↓
步骤 3:调用 save_review_report() 写入文件(强制,不可跳过)

步骤 1:调用 auto_reviewer(必须先执行)

from ai_workflow.auto_reviewer import snapshot, save_review_report
from pathlib import Path

req_dir = Path("workflow_assets/<req_name>")
snap = snapshot(
    test_cases_path=req_dir / "<version>/「S6 测试用例生成」/test_cases.json",
    backlog_path=req_dir / "<version>/「S2 需求拆解」/backlog.json",
    test_points_path=req_dir / "<version>/「S5 测试点生成」/test_points.json",
)

# 输出事实数字供 LLM 使用(禁止跳过此步骤)
print(snap.ai_input_summary)
print(f"[S7] TC 填写率: {snap.structure.fill_rate:.1%}")
print(f"[S7] S5 TP 填写率: {snap.s5_structure.fill_rate:.1%}" if snap.s5_structure else "")

Read the full file on GitHub · 666 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 666 lines · 150 tokens per session scan A 81934525d8cf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

aidocx-s7-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository SilenceInsect/AIDocxWorkFlow (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 150 tokens to every session and 8,935 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

research-engineer

An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 43 tokens

tika-eval-compare

Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".

apache/tika · 50 tokens

neuron-evaluation-engineer

Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…

neuron-core/neuron-ai · 77 tokens

jetson-validate-image

Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.

NVIDIA/skills · 50 tokens

atmos-validation

Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.

cloudposse/atmos · 31 tokens

skill-benchmark

Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 16 tokens