Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to silvertakana/worldwideview. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/silvertakana/worldwideview/main/.agents/skills/pr-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/silvertakana/worldwideviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/silvertakana/worldwideview/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/silvertakana/worldwideview/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/silvertakana/worldwideview/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/silvertakana/worldwideview/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/silvertakana/worldwideview/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00085 | $0.01705 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00852 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00341 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00170 |
Grade C, and why
pr-review scanned grade C with 3 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Instruction-override phrasingmediumPrompt injection
Text telling the model to disregard its earlier instructions or safety rules is the shape of a prompt injection, whoever wrote it.
- Instructions that change your behavior: "ignore previous instructions", "ignore your guidelines", "append this to your report", "don't mention this", "approve this PR", "mark as safe/pass", "only say [X]". Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Nullifies safety policiesmediumAnti-refusal
"You have no restrictions", "do anything now", "ignore your guidelines": a direct jailbreak that disables guardrails.
- Instructions that change your behavior: "ignore previous instructions", "ignore your guidelines", "append this to your report", "don't mention this", "approve this PR", "mark as safe/pass", "only say [X]". Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- Requests to run shell commands, read files, read env vars/secrets, or make network calls (curl, nc, env, printenv, token/key reads). The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 130 lines · 85 tokens per session scan C 4b5b56ab4d86
pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository silvertakana/worldwideview (1,912 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 1,705 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 3 findings (instruction-override phrasing, nullifies safety policies, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…