Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sivaguru-2113/Agent-persona --skill research-methodologygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sivaguru-2113/Agent-personaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sivaguru-2113/agent-persona/research-methodology)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sivaguru-2113/agent-persona/research-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sivaguru-2113/agent-persona/research-methodology/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sivaguru-2113/agent-persona/research-methodology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sivaguru-2113/agent-persona/research-methodology.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00146 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00073 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
research-methodology scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 18 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A ef7e18883dae
research-methodology is a skill published in the GitHub repository sivaguru-2113/Agent-persona (2 stars, last pushed 23d ago), with no licence file. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 146 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
lov-gh-tidy
Interactive GitHub repo hygiene skill. Lists all open issues, PRs, stale branches, and orphan labels, shows a summary of each with analysis, then asks the user how to handle each item (close, merge, comment, delete, keep). Executes all chosen actions via gh CLI. Use when the user says "清理 GitHub", "tidy repo", "clean…
intuitive-preflight
Turn a vague task, plan, issue, or "LGTM/go ahead" request into an approval-ready preflight contract before implementation starts. Use when the user wants prompt preflight, clearer scope, non-goals, context package, acceptance criteria, definition of done, verification, stop gates, the exact execution command, or…
intuitive-squash
Squash local GSD or agent-generated commit history into a clean, reviewable story while preserving important fixes. Use when the user asks to squash commits, clean git history, compress phase commits, prepare a branch before PR, compare aggressive vs moderate squash options, or preserve hotfix/security commits during…
intuitive-refactor
Refactor and cleanup router for known code/module/API seams, stale surfaces, compatibility shims, architecture cleanup targets, changed-code quality review, oversized modules, repeated cleanup campaigns, and recurring whole-repo architecture maintenance goals. Use this when the user names a concrete seam, wants…
intuitive-shape
Shape a raw product or project idea into a bounded decision before planning or implementation. Use when deciding whether an idea deserves a bet, setting an appetite, comparing candidate bets under finite capacity, cutting scope, exposing rabbit holes and no-gos, or choosing BET, RESEARCH, RESHAPE, or PASS. This skill…
convert-to-devto
Converts Markdown content into the format required for Dev.to publication, ensuring correct YAML frontmatter, headers, liquid tags, and inline formatting. Use when the user asks to format or convert an existing blog post or Markdown file for Dev.to.