Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sjarmak/coding-agent-workflows/regex-vs-llm-structured-textnpx skills add sjarmak/coding-agent-workflows --skill regex-vs-llm-structured-textgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sjarmak/coding-agent-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sjarmak/coding-agent-workflows/regex-vs-llm-structured-text)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sjarmak/coding-agent-workflows/regex-vs-llm-structured-text"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sjarmak/coding-agent-workflows/regex-vs-llm-structured-text.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01622 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00811 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00324 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
regex-vs-llm-structured-text scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to regex-vs-llm-structured-text — 20 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 222 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Regex vs LLM for Structured Text Parsing
A practical decision framework for parsing structured text (quizzes, forms, invoices, documents). The key insight: regex handles 95-98% of cases cheaply and deterministically. Reserve expensive LLM calls for the remaining edge cases.
When to Activate
- Parsing structured text with repeating patterns (questions, forms, tables)
- Deciding between regex and LLM for text extraction
- Building hybrid pipelines that combine both approaches
- Optimizing cost/accuracy tradeoffs in text processing
Decision Framework
Is the text format consistent and repeating?
├── Yes (>90% follows a pattern) → Start with Regex
│ ├── Regex handles 95%+ → Done, no LLM needed
│ └── Regex handles <95% → Add LLM for edge cases only
└── No (free-form, highly variable) → Use LLM directly
Architecture Pattern
Source Text
│
▼
[Regex Parser] ─── Extracts structure (95-98% accuracy)
│
▼
[Text Cleaner] ─── Removes noise (markers, page numbers, artifacts)
│
▼
[Confidence Scorer] ─── Flags low-confidence extractions
│
├── High confidence (≥0.95) → Direct output
│
└── Low confidence (<0.95) → [LLM Validator] → Output
Implementation
1. Regex Parser (Handles the Majority)
import re
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class ParsedItem:
id: str
text: str
choices: tuple[str, ...]
answer: str
confidence: float = 1.0
def parse_structured_text(content: str) -> list[ParsedItem]:
"""Parse structured text using regex patterns."""
pattern = re.compile(
r"(?P<id>\d+)\.\s*(?P<text>.+?)\n"
r"(?P<choices>(?:[A-D]\..+?\n)+)"
r"Answer:\s*(?P<answer>[A-D])",
re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL,
)
items = []
for match in pattern.finditer(content):
choices = tuple(
c.strip() for c in re.findall(r"[A-D]\.\s*(.+)", match.group("choices"))
)
items.append(ParsedItem(
id=match.group("id"),
text=match.group("text").strip(),
choices=choices,
answer=match.group("answer"),
))
return items
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 222 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 1559ea718a1d
regex-vs-llm-structured-text is a skill published in the GitHub repository sjarmak/coding-agent-workflows (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,622 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to regex-vs-llm-structured-text, differing in 20 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
developing-genkit-js
Develop AI-powered applications using Genkit in Node.js/TypeScript. Use when the user asks about Genkit, AI agents, flows, or tools in JavaScript/TypeScript, or when encountering Genkit errors, validation issues, type errors, or API problems.
agent-platform-prompt-management
Manages and orchestrates prompts in Agent Platform. Use when you need to create, list, retrieve, version, or delete managed prompts in Agent Platform. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform prompts.
gke-inference
Deploys and optimizes AI/ML inference workloads on GKE, using GPUs, TPUs, and model servers. Use when deploying GKE inference servers, configuring GKE GPU resources for inference, or deploying LLMs on GKE. Don't use for generic batch jobs or HPC task queues (use gke-batch-hpc instead).
agent-platform-endpoint-management
Manages Agent Platform serving endpoints. Use when you need to create, list, describe, update, or delete serving endpoints for model deployment on Agent Platform. Also use when troubleshooting endpoint permission, quota, or resource busy errors. Don't use for deploying models to endpoints or for running model…
graphify
Use for any question about a codebase, its architecture, file relationships, or project content — especially when graphify-out/ exists, where the question should be treated as a graphify query first. Turns any input (code, docs, papers, images, videos) into a persistent knowledge graph with god nodes, community…
google-cloud-solution-agentic-ai-data-science-workflow
Designs a tailored multi-product agentic data science architecture on Google Cloud that incorporates opinionated best practices. Use when architecting multi-product solutions for agent-based data analytics or ML workloads. Don't use for simple queries, non-agentic pipelines, general cloud reviews, or writing agent…