Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sjarmak/coding-agent-workflows/scaffoldnpx skills add sjarmak/coding-agent-workflows --skill scaffoldgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sjarmak/coding-agent-workflowsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01910 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00955 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00382 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00191 |
Grade A, and why
scaffold scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scaffold: Build-Order Planning
Take a chosen design (from diverge-prototype or any architecture decision) and
spawn N independent agents, each proposing a different build-order strategy. Each
produces a sequenced implementation plan with milestones, dependencies, and a
risk assessment; the results synthesize into one recommended build plan.
Arguments
[N] [path/to/design.md | inline description]
- N is the number of strategies (default 4, min 2, max 6).
- Input is a path to a design doc/prototype/PRD, or an inline description of what needs to be built. Missing or unclear: ask the user to clarify before starting.
Phase 1: Understand the Design
Read the design doc, prototype, or PRD provided. Extract the following:
- Components to build: every distinct module, service, or subsystem
- Dependencies between them: what requires what
- External integrations: third-party APIs, databases, services
- Testing requirements: what needs testing and at what level
- Deployment needs: infrastructure, environments, CI/CD
Prepare a build brief that summarizes:
- What needs to be built
- What exists already (if working within an existing codebase)
- What the constraints are (technical, timeline, team)
Present the build brief to the user and confirm before proceeding. Adjust if the user gives feedback.
Phase 2: Spawn Sequencing Agents
Launch all N agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Each agent receives the build brief plus a unique sequencing strategy drawn from this pool (assign strategies 1 through N):
- "Riskiest-First": Start with the highest-uncertainty components. Front-load risk to learn early whether the approach works. Motto: "fail fast on the hard stuff."
- "Demo-able First": Start with the components that produce visible, testable output. Build stakeholder confidence early. Motto: "something to show every sprint."
- "Dependency-Topological": Strict dependency order. Build foundations first, layers on top. Nothing starts until its dependencies are complete. Motto: "no stubs, no mocks, each piece works when built."
- "Vertical Slice": Build one thin end-to-end path through the entire system first. Proves integration works before widening. Motto: "narrow and deep before wide."
- "Test Infrastructure First": Start with test harness, CI/CD, monitoring, observability. Build the ability to verify before building things to verify. Motto: "confidence before velocity."
- "Parallel Tracks": Identify independent work streams that can proceed simultaneously. Optimize for team throughput. Motto: "max parallelism, defined interfaces."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 189 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 510846ff9da6
scaffold is a skill published in the GitHub repository sjarmak/coding-agent-workflows (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,910 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
browser-trace
Capture a full DevTools-protocol trace of any browser automation — CDP firehose, screenshots, and DOM dumps — then bisect the stream into per-page searchable buckets. Use when the user wants to debug a failed run, audit network/console/DOM activity, attach a trace to an in-progress session, or feed structured per-page…
planning-with-files
Manus-style persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents: keeps taskplan.md, findings.md, and progress.md on disk so work survives context loss and /clear. Use when asked to plan out, break down, or organize a multi-step project, research task, or any work requiring 5+ tool calls. Supports automatic session…
ai-elements
Build AI chat interfaces using ai-elements components — conversations, messages, tool displays, prompt inputs, and more. Use when the user wants to build a chatbot, AI assistant UI, or any AI-powered chat interface.
exa-search
Use Exa MCP for current web, code/docs, company, people, and page-fetch research. Prefer current hosted tool schemas and note deprecated tools.
ontoly-software-graph
Use Ontoly's deterministic Software Graph and MCP capabilities for repository architecture, request tracing, dependency analysis, configuration lookup, and impact analysis before falling back to source search.
product-decision-agent
中文产品决策 Agent。用于中国大陆互联网产品、运营、增长、商业化、数据、项目推进和组织协作场景:产品规划、需求分析、PRD、需求优先级、排期、版本规划、Roadmap、MVP、灰度、上线、迭代、增长停滞、拉新、投放、渠道、裂变、CAC、LTV、ROI、留存、转化、DAU/MAU、GMV、漏斗、社区运营、内容供给、创作者、用户运营、活动运营、私域、会员、定价、指标异常、数据口径、埋点、A/B…