Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup --skill build-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup/build-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup/build-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup/build-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup/build-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup/build-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00643 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00257 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
build-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- build-test — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Build test
Spec §20.2 / §22.4: the "subjective critique-theater panel" is
not enough on its own — a code-migration / tune-collab run must
prove the build still passes. This atom shells out to the
project's declared test commands and emits structured signals the
devloop's until evaluator reads.
Inputs
- The active target stack (recorded in
code/index.json+plan.md's targetStack block). - The user's optional override (
od plugin run --input testCommand='pnpm test').
Default commands by framework
| framework | typecheck | test |
|---|---|---|
| next | pnpm typecheck |
pnpm test |
| vite | pnpm typecheck |
pnpm test |
| remix | pnpm typecheck |
pnpm test |
| custom | (read from package.json.scripts) |
(read from package.json.scripts) |
Output
project-cwd/
└── critique/
├── build-test.json # { build: 'passing' | 'failing', tests: 'passing' | 'failing' | 'skipped', durationMs, commandsRun: [...], failures: [...] }
└── build-test.log # raw stdout / stderr (truncated to OD_BUILD_TEST_LOG_BUDGET_BYTES, default 1 MiB)
The atom emits two signals the devloop reads:
build.passing: boolean— the typecheck command exited 0.tests.passing: boolean— the test command exited 0.
Plus the legacy critique.score so existing pipelines that read
the score keep working: 5 when both pass, 3 when only build
passes, 1 when both fail.
Convergence
Pipelines wire the atom into a devloop:
{
"id": "verify",
"atoms": ["patch-edit", "build-test"],
"repeat": true,
"until": "(build.passing && tests.passing) || iterations >= 8"
}
Anti-patterns the prompt fragment forbids
- Running tests on a partially-edited working tree (the atom
always runs after
patch-edit, and only whenplan.steps's current step is incompletedstate). - Suppressing test failures by changing test files; that violates the rewrite-plan ownership rule.
- Setting
tests: 'skipped'without a non-emptyreasonfield.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A b841463c16a3
build-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup (48 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 643 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
eval-dataset-design
A guide to creating reliable test sets for AI agents. Each evaluation task includes the request, the simulated user's behaviour, a reset starting state, and a success check that can be independently verified.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.