Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wolfenazz/YzPzCode --skill build-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wolfenazz/YzPzCodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wolfenazz/yzpzcode/build-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wolfenazz/yzpzcode/build-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wolfenazz/yzpzcode/build-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wolfenazz/yzpzcode/build-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wolfenazz/yzpzcode/build-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00643 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00257 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
build-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to build-test — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Build test
Spec §20.2 / §22.4: the "subjective critique-theater panel" is
not enough on its own — a code-migration / tune-collab run must
prove the build still passes. This atom shells out to the
project's declared test commands and emits structured signals the
devloop's until evaluator reads.
Inputs
- The active target stack (recorded in
code/index.json+plan.md's targetStack block). - The user's optional override (
od plugin run --input testCommand='pnpm test').
Default commands by framework
| framework | typecheck | test |
|---|---|---|
| next | pnpm typecheck |
pnpm test |
| vite | pnpm typecheck |
pnpm test |
| remix | pnpm typecheck |
pnpm test |
| custom | (read from package.json.scripts) |
(read from package.json.scripts) |
Output
project-cwd/
└── critique/
├── build-test.json # { build: 'passing' | 'failing', tests: 'passing' | 'failing' | 'skipped', durationMs, commandsRun: [...], failures: [...] }
└── build-test.log # raw stdout / stderr (truncated to OD_BUILD_TEST_LOG_BUDGET_BYTES, default 1 MiB)
The atom emits two signals the devloop reads:
build.passing: boolean— the typecheck command exited 0.tests.passing: boolean— the test command exited 0.
Plus the legacy critique.score so existing pipelines that read
the score keep working: 5 when both pass, 3 when only build
passes, 1 when both fail.
Convergence
Pipelines wire the atom into a devloop:
{
"id": "verify",
"atoms": ["patch-edit", "build-test"],
"repeat": true,
"until": "(build.passing && tests.passing) || iterations >= 8"
}
Anti-patterns the prompt fragment forbids
- Running tests on a partially-edited working tree (the atom
always runs after
patch-edit, and only whenplan.steps's current step is incompletedstate). - Suppressing test failures by changing test files; that violates the rewrite-plan ownership rule.
- Setting
tests: 'skipped'without a non-emptyreasonfield.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A b841463c16a3
build-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository wolfenazz/YzPzCode (20 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 643 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to build-test, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
fix-bug
Investigates and fixes a reported bug. Reads relevant code, identifies the root cause, proposes a fix, and adds or updates tests to prevent regression. Invoked when the user describes unexpected behavior, an error, a crash, or a failing test.
debugging
Use when debugging bugs, test failures, or unexpected behavior. Triggers: 'why isn't this working', 'this doesn't work', 'X is broken', 'something's wrong', 'getting an error', 'exception in', 'stopped working', 'regression', 'crash', 'hang', 'flaky test', 'intermittent failure', or when user pastes a stack…
ralphctl-debugging-and-error-recovery
Systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, something that worked before broke, or behaviour does not match expectations — when you need to figure out what broke and why. Follow stop-the-line → reproduce → localize → reduce → root-cause → guard-with-regression-test → verify, not guessing; the…
dart-flutter-equatable-engineering
Design, implement, review, debug, test, migrate, and optimize value equality in production Dart and Flutter code using Equatable or appropriate alternatives. Use this skill whenever work involves Equatable, props, immutable Bloc/Cubit states or events, equality bugs, suppressed state emissions, lists/sets/maps in…
test-fix
Automatically invoke when any test run produces failures: FAIL output, test errors, or assertion failures in unit or E2E suites. Do NOT wait for the user to ask. Hard limit of 3 fix attempts per failure, then stops and escalates. Trigger on: "tests are failing", "fix the tests", "tests are broken".
vue-component-testing
Applies the three-tier test taxonomy for Vue 3 applications: writes unit tests for composables and Pinia stores with Vitest, component tests for behaviour and user interactions with @testing-library/vue, and acceptance tests for full user flows with Playwright. Ensures tests focus on observable behaviour, not…