Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skillmds/skillmd --skill agentic-kaggle-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skillmds/skillmdWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/agentic-kaggle-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/agentic-kaggle-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skillmds/skillmd/agentic-kaggle-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/agentic-kaggle-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skillmds/skillmd/agentic-kaggle-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.03255 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.01302 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00651 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00326 |
Grade A, and why
agentic-kaggle-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to agentic-kaggle-skill — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agentic Kaggle Skill
Operating Loop
Treat every competition as a validation problem first and a modeling problem second. The default target platform is Kaggle, so prefer Kaggle-native notebooks/scripts, datasets, model artifacts, competition submissions, and score receipts. For code competitions, assume the final notebook/kernel will be rerun by Kaggle against hidden data unless the competition docs prove otherwise.
- Read the competition page, classify the submission mode as classic file submission or code/notebook scoring, then inspect the rules, data-use terms, sharing policy, data dictionary, metric, submission format, train/test construction hints, and leakage warnings.
- If live competition intelligence tools are available, inspect top public open notebook solutions and relevant discussion activity before major architecture choices; treat them as clues, not authority.
- Identify the task type: binary, multiclass, multilabel, regression, ranking, image, segmentation, text, time series, grouped entities, or a hybrid.
- Design folds before feature engineering or modeling. Prefer a fold column saved into the training data so every experiment uses the same comparison surface.
- Build the simplest metric-correct baseline and produce out-of-fold (OOF) predictions plus a valid submission.
- Proactively plan a stronger architecture once the baseline is trustworthy: diverse model families, feature/embedding producers, augmentation/pseudo-label/distillation stages, calibration/postprocessing, and an ensemble or stacker.
- Iterate with validation gates: test one meaningful change at a time when possible, but launch several independent producer notebooks in parallel when they create diverse artifacts that can be compared by OOF score or ensemble diversity.
- Offload heavy training, inference, embedding generation, image/text experiments, or memory-risky jobs to Kaggle notebooks/scripts when local compute may OOM or take too long.
- For sophisticated architectures, split work into a small Kaggle pipeline: run several independent producer notebooks/scripts first, save each useful producer output as a private Kaggle dataset, then run one consumer notebook/script that attaches those datasets and creates the final OOF/test/submission outputs. When a producer trains a model, its checkpoint, tokenizer/config, fold metadata, OOF/test predictions, and manifest should be exported as a Kaggle dataset; downstream notebooks load the model from
/kaggle/input/.... - Submit the final submission-producing artifact to Kaggle for scoring and retrieve the resulting submission status/score.
- If Kaggle returns a code-competition error or vague scoring failure, enter the debugging loop: retrieve available logs, classify likely failure mode, patch defensively, rerun the final kernel, resubmit, and repeat until scored or concretely blocked.
- Track local CV, remote Kaggle run status, Kaggle submission score, public LB, private-risk notes, seed, code version, data version, and artifact paths for every run.
- Ensemble only with OOF predictions generated without in-fold leakage.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 193 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 4410cc30e60f
agentic-kaggle-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository skillmds/skillmd (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 3,255 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agentic-kaggle-skill, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
glycobiology
Glycosylation site prediction and glycobiology analysis. N-glycosylation motif finding, O-glycosylation hotspot prediction, glycan structure resources. Lightweight, pure Python. For protein function queries use uniprot-database; for structure analysis use alphafold-database.
shap
Model interpretability and explainability using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). Use this skill when explaining machine learning model predictions, computing feature importance, generating SHAP plots (waterfall, beeswarm, bar, scatter, force, heatmap), debugging models, analyzing model bias or fairness, comparing…
cellxgene-census
Query the CELLxGENE Census (61M+ cells) programmatically. Use when you need expression data across tissues, diseases, or cell types from the largest curated single-cell atlas. Best for population-scale queries, reference atlas comparisons. For analyzing your own data use scanpy or scvi-tools.
esm
Comprehensive toolkit for protein language models including ESM3 (generative multimodal protein design across sequence, structure, and function) and ESM C (efficient protein embeddings and representations). Use this skill when working with protein sequences, structures, or function prediction; designing novel…
aeon
This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard…
llm-as-judge-evaluation
Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.