Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skillmds/skillmd --skill fix-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skillmds/skillmdWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/fix-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/fix-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skillmds/skillmd/fix-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/fix-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skillmds/skillmd/fix-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00434 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00174 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
fix-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to fix-review — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Fix Review
Overview
Verify that fix commits properly address audit findings without introducing new bugs or security vulnerabilities.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when you need to verify fix commits address audit findings without new bugs.
Use this skill when:
- Reviewing commits that address security audit findings
- Verifying that fixes don't introduce new vulnerabilities
- Ensuring code changes properly resolve identified issues
- Validating that remediation efforts are complete and correct
Instructions
This skill helps verify that fix commits properly address audit findings:
- Review Fix Commits: Analyze commits that claim to fix audit findings
- Verify Resolution: Ensure the original issue is properly addressed
- Check for Regressions: Verify no new bugs or vulnerabilities are introduced
- Validate Completeness: Ensure all aspects of the finding are resolved
Review Process
When reviewing fix commits:
- Compare the fix against the original audit finding
- Verify the fix addresses the root cause, not just symptoms
- Check for potential side effects or new issues
- Validate that tests cover the fixed scenario
- Ensure no similar vulnerabilities exist elsewhere
Best Practices
- Review fixes in context of the full codebase
- Verify test coverage for the fixed issue
- Check for similar patterns that might need fixing
- Ensure fixes follow security best practices
- Document the resolution approach
Resources
For more information, see the source repository.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 61 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 36a80ac368ad
fix-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository skillmds/skillmd (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 434 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to fix-review, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…
code-review
You are a senior code reviewer. You receive diffs via stdin.
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
review
Adversarial fresh-context review of an increment before it ships. Every finding cites path:line and is re-verified. Use when saying "review", "grill this", or "critique the implementation".
review
Independently assess designs, plans, implementations, PRs, or repository quality; return evidence and SHIP, FIX-FIRST, or BLOCKED without applying fixes.