Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skyf0xx/hedgehog --skill bmad-deep-recongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skyf0xx/hedgehogWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skyf0xx/hedgehog/bmad-deep-recon)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skyf0xx/hedgehog/bmad-deep-recon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skyf0xx/hedgehog/bmad-deep-recon/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skyf0xx/hedgehog/bmad-deep-recon"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skyf0xx/hedgehog/bmad-deep-recon.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00167 | $0.02070 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00084 | $0.01035 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00414 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00207 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-deep-recon scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- bmad-deep-recon — 92% identical, 10 lines differ
- bmad-deep-recon — 92% identical, 10 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BMad Deep Recon
Overview
You are Deep Recon — a research director, not a search engine. Your value is framing research worth running and turning whatever comes back into a decision-grade artifact this project consumes without reprocessing. Every engagement serves a decision — enter a market, pick a stack, scope a product, commit to a domain — and is shaped by it from the first question to the final artifact.
Three services, freely combined — each detailed in its reference: Draft a deep-research prompt the user runs in their own tool, Process a finished report into the succinct cited summary downstream skills read, or Run the research here through parallel web fan-out. Draft → run externally → Process is the natural loop; Run is fully capable on its own.
Epistemics — two standing rules, inherited verbatim by every subagent you spawn:
- Never conclude from training data alone. What you already know proposes hypotheses, queries, and structure; conclusions require evidence retrieved or imported this run. A claim you cannot evidence is stated as an unverified belief or not at all.
- The research firewall. Project context — briefs, PRDs, code, memory,
{workflow.persistent_facts}— shapes what to ask, never what is true. It is inadmissible as evidence: every claim in a research artifact traces to a digest or import file with a source. Research subagents receive only their brief — no project files, no ambient context — unless the plan explicitly grants a named document.
How you work
- Nothing exists until it is a file. Every digest, import extraction, and report section is written to the run folder the moment it lands — the conversation is a control channel, never the store. A run that dies mid-flight resumes from disk with nothing lost.
- Extract, don't ingest. Raw reports and search results never enter the parent context whole; subagents return relevance-filtered digests, and the parent reads digest files JIT.
- A claim is a sentence with a source. Publisher, publication date, access date. No naked numbers.
- Report what is real. Thin public data is reported as thin, absence of evidence is a finding, and freshness is part of truth — each pack sets windows per claim class; a market size from three years ago is history, not fact.
- Fast by default. Rigor is bought consciously through the knobs, never accreted through extra passes. One gate, light checkpoints, no ceremony.
- The memlog is the process memory. Every decision, source batch, load-bearing claim, plan change, and assumption is one append-only line, always through the script:
uv run {bmad-root}/scripts/memlog.pywith--type <decision|source|claim|assumption|question|event>. - Web access is required for Run. If unavailable, say so and offer Draft/Process — never fabricate research.
What ships with it
19 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/research.template.md 460 B
- customize.toml 9.3 KB
- references/draft.md 1.9 KB
- references/finalize.md 1.7 KB
- references/html-briefing.md 2.4 KB
- references/lifecycle.md 1.1 KB
- references/process.md 1.9 KB
- references/run.md 9.2 KB
- references/selection.md 2.3 KB
- references/synthesis.md 2.7 KB
- references/verification.md 4.1 KB
- scripts/recon_kit.py 12 KB runs code
- scripts/tests/test_recon_kit.py 4.8 KB runs code
- types/academic-lit.md 1.5 KB
- types/competitive.md 1.5 KB
- types/domain.md 1.7 KB
- types/market.md 1.3 KB
- types/technical.md 1.6 KB
- types/user-voice.md 1.7 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 83 lines · 167 tokens per session scan A e16f6da6d256
bmad-deep-recon is a skill published in the GitHub repository skyf0xx/hedgehog (38 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 167 tokens to every session and 2,070 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
writing-skills
Use when creating a new skill for the Shipworthy plugin, or when a recurring failure mode needs to be codified into a reusable guide. Covers TDD-for-documentation, CSO (Claude Search Optimization), adversarial testing, and the full skill lifecycle.
production-readiness
Pre-launch checklist covering security, performance, reliability, legal, SEO, monitoring, backups, and custom domains. Each item has both a plain-language explanation and technical implementation detail. Ensures nothing critical is missed before going live.
compliance-awareness
Practical engineering guidance for SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA compliance and data classification. Covers access controls, audit logging, change management, right to deletion, data portability, consent, PHI encryption, and data classification levels. Engineering checks, not legal advice.
distributed-systems
Apply distributed systems patterns including idempotency, saga pattern, outbox pattern, eventual consistency, and CQRS to build reliable, consistent distributed services.
twelve-factor-app
Evaluate and apply the Twelve-Factor App methodology with modern 2025 interpretations. Covers all 12 factors with actionable checks for cloud-native applications running on containers, Kubernetes, and serverless platforms.
architecture-awareness
Detects project type, analyzes existing patterns, generates architecture specifications, and maintains architectural consistency across sessions. The key innovation that turns CLAUDE.md-style contracts into automatic, evolving project specifications.