Skill Claude CodeCodex
Use when reviewing Go, Python, or TypeScript code for over-engineering, reducing complexity after prototyping, enforcing reuse over addition, simplifying before a refactor, or auditing a codebase after a library or framework migration. Covers duplication, reinvented primitives, avoidable abstractions, dead logic…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Use when reviewing Go, Python, or TypeScript code for classic code smells, preparing a refactor, auditing code after rapid feature development, or hunting for misplaced responsibilities and undermodeled domain concepts. Covers feature envy, data clumps, shotgun surgery, temporal coupling, comments as deodorant…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Review a GitHub pull request — fetches context, builds an intent model, runs 3 parallel review agents (Correctness, Conventions, Efficiency & Safety), validates findings against actual code, and publishes one structured review. Triggers on "review this PR", "review PR #123", "review github.com/owner/repo/pull/N"…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Act as a senior Go engineer performing a critical design and testing review. Evaluates architecture, patterns, idiomaticity, over-engineering, testing strategy, and proposes concrete improvements — all grounded in the codebase. Use when: reviewing a Go codebase for design soundness, testing robustness, or overall code…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Grilling session that challenges your requirements against the existing codebase. Reports omit empty sections — no placeholder headings, empty tables, or negative statements like "no issues found".
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Clarify the user’s intent for vague, incomplete, or ambiguous clauses, statements, and requirements before modifying the code. Reports omit empty sections — no placeholder headings, empty tables, or negative statements like "no issues found".
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Go packages for boundary violations — leaked internals via exports, coupling through shared types, import cycles, missing internal/ packages, over-exported APIs, and dependency direction violations. Use when: reviewing package structure, shrinking public API surface, enforcing encapsulation, preparing packages…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Go code for missing documentation where the "why" is not obvious — obscure calculations, non-trivial business rules, surprising behavior, implicit constraints, workarounds, and missing godoc on exported symbols. Finds where a comment would save the next reader significant time. Use when: reviewing Go code for…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Go code for weak invariants — unchecked errors, nil pointer risks, ignored context cancellation, unsafe type assertions, zero-value traps, panic/recover misuse, and missing validation at construction boundaries. Use when: tightening domain models, reducing panic risks, increasing error handling discipline, or…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Run all 10 Go code quality hunters in parallel as subagents and write each report to a timestamped reports folder. Covers boundary, doc, invariant, security, simplicity, slop, smell, solid, test, and type hunters. Use when: running a full Go codebase audit, scanning all quality dimensions at once, preparing for a code…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Go code for security vulnerabilities — hardcoded secrets, injection risks (SQL, command, template, path), missing input validation at trust boundaries, insecure defaults, auth gaps, sensitive data exposure, unsafe package usage, and weak crypto. Use when: reviewing Go code before deployment, auditing trust…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Go code for unnecessary structural complexity — duplication, reinvented primitives, avoidable abstractions, dead logic paths, over-parameterized APIs, deep nesting, interface pollution, channel misuse, mixed concerns, and coexisting abstraction generations left behind by unfinished migrations. Recommends the…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Go code for AI-generated noise — redundant comments, verbose documentation, style drift from project conventions and gofmt, trivially dead code, and unnecessary error wrapping. Surface-level hygiene pass; defaults to branch diff but supports any scope. Use when: reviewing AI-assisted Go code before merge…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Go code for classic code smells — feature envy, data clumps, shotgun surgery, primitive obsession, temporal coupling, comments as deodorant, temporary fields, init() abuse, package-level mutable state, and stuttering names. Use when: reviewing Go code for structural design problems, preparing for a refactor…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Go code for design principle violations — god packages, rigid extension points, broken interface contracts, fat interfaces, and concrete dependency chains. Adapted from SOLID for Go's composition-over-inheritance model. Use when: reviewing package structure, preparing for extension with new variants, reducing…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Go test code for quality gaps — missing coverage on critical paths, brittle tests coupled to implementation, over-mocking, assertion-free tests, missing edge cases, table-driven test misuse, and race condition blindness. Focuses on test effectiveness. Use when: reviewing Go test suites for reliability, reducing…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Go type definitions for design debt — duplicated struct shapes, misused generics, under-constrained type parameters, embedding antipatterns, poor enum patterns, and disorganized type architecture. Type structure and maintainability. Use when: reviewing type definitions for maintainability, reducing type…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Python packages and modules for black-box boundary violations — leaked internals via exports, coupling through shared types, Law of Demeter chains, missing abstraction layers around externals, and over-exported APIs. Use when: reviewing package structure, shrinking public API surface, enforcing encapsulation…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Python code for missing or misleading inline documentation where the "why" is not obvious — obscure calculations, non-trivial business rules, surprising behavior, implicit constraints, workarounds, and stale comments that contradict the current code. Finds where a comment would save the next reader significant…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Python code for error handling design quality — missing exception hierarchies, lost exception chains, return-None antipatterns, over-broad try/except, silent suppression, poor exception context, framework handler gaps, and missing error boundaries. Use when: reviewing error handling strategy, tightening…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Python code for weak invariants — unnecessary casts, loose optionality, defensive None-checks masking missing guarantees, leaky tagged unions, error suppression, and runtime checks that the type system or construction boundaries should enforce. Use when: tightening post-construction guarantees, reducing type…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Run all 12 Python code quality hunters in parallel as subagents and write each report to a timestamped reports folder. Covers boundary, doc, error, invariant, perf, security, simplicity, slop, smell, solid, test, and type hunters. Use when: running a full Python codebase audit, scanning all quality dimensions at once…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Python code for performance antipatterns and resource management issues — blocking I/O in async contexts, sequential awaits, N+1 queries, unclosed resources, unbounded caches, eager materialization, missing connection pooling, and expensive operations in hot paths. Use when: reviewing async correctness, auditing…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Audit Python code for security vulnerabilities — hardcoded secrets, injection risks, missing input validation at trust boundaries, insecure defaults, auth gaps, sensitive data exposure, and unsafe patterns like eval, pickle, or shell injection. Use when: reviewing Python code before deployment, auditing trust…
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: