Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/plugin install ruby-grape-railsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.05234 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.02094 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00523 |
Grade A, and why
rb:triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 476 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Triage Review Findings
Batch-select findings from the review before creating follow-up work.
Iron Laws
- Auto-include all Iron Law violations - these are never optional
- Separate safety fixes from style preferences - prioritize data integrity
- Group related findings - fix together what belongs together
- Defer performance optimizations without profiling data
- Use structured multi-select, not freeform chat prompts — when asking the user which findings to keep, use a checkbox-style selection UI
Workflow
Review File
↓
Parse Findings (Blocker / Warning / Suggestion)
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Auto-Categorize │
├─────────────────┤
│ • Blocker │ → always include (auto, never optional)
│ • Warning │ → recommend (default selected; user may defer)
│ • Suggestion │ → defer (default unselected; user may include)
└─────────────────┘
↓
Present Grouped Findings
↓
User Selects Items
↓
Write Triage Output
↓
Next Action
Severity Classification
Map review buckets (Blocker | Warning | Suggestion) to triage
priorities. Within each bucket, order security findings only by
evidence_mode (defined in
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/security/SKILL.md § "Evidence Mode" and
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/security-analyzer.md § "Evidence Mode (mandatory)"):
runtime-confirmed— act firstconfiguration-riskstatic-signalrequires-human-validation— surface to user for decision
Non-security findings carry no evidence_mode. Retain agent-emitted
order within the bucket.
Blocker → Always Include
- Iron Law violations: transaction safety, after_commit discipline, JSON-safe args
- Security issues: SQL injection, XSS, mass assignment, hardcoded secrets
- Data integrity: missing constraints, race conditions, incorrect null handling
- N+1 queries: database performance killers
- Transaction safety: operations outside transactions that should be inside
Warning → Recommend Include
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 476 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 30193429ba91
rb:triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails (7 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 5,234 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
tuicr
Use tuicr's review CLI to read and add comments in active TUI review sessions, and launch tuicr in cmux, tmux, Zellij, or Herdr when a user needs an interactive review pane.
liveagent-code-review
Review an open GitHub pull request or the current local branch and working tree with parallel, independent reviewers and evidence-based validation. Use when the user asks for code review, invokes the Code Review action from Git Review, or explicitly mentions this skill.
omh-image-cards
This is an OMH img-summary workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
omh-ai-slop-cleaner
This is an OMH ai-slop-cleaner workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
omh-verification-gate
This is an OMH verification-gate workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).