Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add slopus/happy-agent --skill guided-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/slopus/happy-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/slopus/happy-agent/guided-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/slopus/happy-agent/guided-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/slopus/happy-agent/guided-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/slopus/happy-agent/guided-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/slopus/happy-agent/guided-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.03792 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.01517 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00758 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00379 |
Grade A, and why
guided-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 292 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Guided review as an inline artifact
A big diff in file order makes a reader jump between files for half an hour to learn what the change even does. A guided review does that work for them in a minute: what the change is, how control now flows through it, what changed in its contracts — types, signatures, endpoints — and then its ideas in chapters, most important first, each beside the code that shows it. A reader learns a change from its calls and its contracts, not from its list of files; the diff viewer already has that list.
Build it as one html artifact shown inline: the chat draws it right in your
reply at its full height, laid on the chat's own surface. You write its files
with the artifact tools, patching them with edit_artifact_file as you would
any other file, and every tool call that changes it makes a new version the
chat follows in place. Everything it quotes
comes from the real change, through Happy's standard components; you never
copy code into it by hand.
The pieces
Make the artifact first, then give it two files.
-
create_artifactwithtype: "html", a short title ("Review: crop before upload"), anddisplay: "inline_expanded". It returns the artifact's id. -
changes.diff— the change itself, written by git, never by hand. Write it to a scratch file inside your working directory with the shell, then publish it withupdate_artifactandfiles: [{ "fromPath": ".context/changes.diff", "path": "changes.diff" }]:mkdir -p .context && git diff <base> > .context/changes.diff # New files are part of the change too. git ls-files --others --exclude-standard -z \ | xargs -0 -I{} git diff --no-index /dev/null {} >> .context/changes.diffFor a committed range use
git diff <base> <head>and nothing else. For an explanation of code that did not change, skip the diff and publish the real source files withupdate_artifactandfiles: [{ "fromPath": "src/app.ts", "path": "src/app.ts" }]. Quote their lines with<happy-code>. -
index.html— the review, written withwrite_artifact_file, in this order: the standard styles, your few lines of CSS, the HTML, and the components script last.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +11 lines 94701f4f226e
- 10d ago First seen · 281 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A c8293029f2b4
guided-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository slopus/happy-agent (38 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 3,792 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-28.
guided-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| guided-reviewslopus/happy-agent | Skill | 38 | yesterday | MIT | A | 101 | Claude Code, Codex |
| autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub | Skill | 9.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.2k | yesterday | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiff-planumputun/revdiff | Skill | 945 | yesterday | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| explore-unknownsdzhng/skills | Skill | 1.4k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code, Codex |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |