Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add soba-labs/langchain-agent-skills --skill deepagents-planning-todosgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/soba-labs/langchain-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/soba-labs/langchain-agent-skills/deepagents-planning-todos)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/soba-labs/langchain-agent-skills/deepagents-planning-todos"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soba-labs/langchain-agent-skills/deepagents-planning-todos/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/soba-labs/langchain-agent-skills/deepagents-planning-todos"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soba-labs/langchain-agent-skills/deepagents-planning-todos.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 155 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00108 | $0.02148 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00043 | $0.00859 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00430 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
deepagents-planning-todos scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 248 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deep Agents Planning and Todos
Master the write_todos tool for effective task planning and decomposition in Deep Agents.
Use This Skill When
- You need to break down complex multi-step tasks (3+ steps) into trackable subtasks.
- You want to show users the plan before executing (user approval workflow).
- You're debugging why todos aren't completing as expected.
- You need patterns for different task types (research, coding, analysis, document processing).
- You want to visualize todo progression from LangSmith traces.
When To Use write_todos
| Use write_todos | Execute Directly |
|---|---|
| ✅ Complex multi-step tasks (3-6 steps) | ✅ Simple 1-2 step queries |
| ✅ Tasks requiring user approval first | ✅ Single tool calls |
| ✅ Long-running workflows needing progress tracking | ✅ Quick information lookups |
| ✅ Tasks where planning adds clarity | ✅ Straightforward API calls |
Decision rule: If you'd benefit from showing the user "Here's my plan..." before starting, use write_todos.
Quick Start
from deepagents import create_deep_agent
# TodoListMiddleware is included by default in create_deep_agent
agent = create_deep_agent(
model="anthropic:claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
tools=[search_tool, summarize_tool],
system_prompt="You are a research assistant. Use write_todos for multi-step tasks."
)
# Agent workflow:
# 1. Call write_todos with initial plan
# 2. Ask user: "Does this plan look good?"
# 3. User approves → start executing
# 4. Update the todo list as work progresses
# 5. Keep todos aligned with the current plan and execution state
Example todo creation:
# Agent calls write_todos internally:
{
"name": "write_todos",
"arguments": {
"todos": [
{"content": "Search for papers on LLM agents", "status": "pending"},
{"content": "Read and extract findings from top 5 papers", "status": "pending"},
{"content": "Identify common themes", "status": "pending"},
{"content": "Write summary report", "status": "pending"}
]
}
}
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/examples/todo-driven-agent/.env.example 415 B
- assets/examples/todo-driven-agent/agent.py 4.8 KB runs code
- assets/examples/todo-driven-agent/pyproject.toml 350 B
- assets/examples/todo-driven-agent/README.md 4.6 KB
- assets/todo-structures/coding-todos.json 950 B
- assets/todo-structures/research-todos.json 911 B
- references/todo-patterns.md 12 KB
- scripts/.gitignore 35 B
- scripts/visualize_todos.py 10 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 248 lines · 108 tokens per session scan A 8aaa7d5db9f8
deepagents-planning-todos is a skill published in the GitHub repository soba-labs/langchain-agent-skills (106 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 108 tokens to every session and 2,148 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
deepagents-planning-todos compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deepagents-planning-todossoba-labs/langchain-agent-skills | Skill | 106 | 18d ago | MIT | A | 108 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | yesterday | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 100k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| browser-automationopenclaw/openclaw | Skill | 394k | today | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 314k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | today | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |