review-external-prs

review-external-prs is a skill for Codex from solana-foundation/solana-com. It costs 94 tokens per session (2,065 once invoked), scanned A, original, GPL-3.0.

A pull-request review process for contributions from people outside the Solana Foundation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Screening external pull requests, checking signed and squashed commits, closing unsuitable contributions when allowed, and writing a maintainer report.
Why use it?
It helps maintainers identify scams, low-trust submissions, and pull requests that do not meet the repository's commit rules.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present.

Good fit Screening external pull requests, checking signed and squashed commits, closing unsuitable contributions when allowed, and writing a maintainer report.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/solana-foundation/solana-com/review-external-prs
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add solana-foundation/solana-com --skill review-external-prs
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/solana-foundation/solana-com

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-external-prs

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/solana-foundation/solana-com/review-external-prs/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/solana-foundation/solana-com/review-external-prs)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/solana-foundation/solana-com/review-external-prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/solana-foundation/solana-com/review-external-prs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-external-prs

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/solana-foundation/solana-com/review-external-prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/solana-foundation/solana-com/review-external-prs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 94 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,065 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Agent Snooping · line 126
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
How audits are shown
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00094 $0.02065
Opus 5 $0.00047 $0.01033
Sonnet 5 $0.00019 $0.00413
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00206

Measured 7d ago against content hash bf7f8ee162fb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-external-prs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 5 executable files (scripts/check_commit_security.py, scripts/guarded_close.py, scripts/list_external_prs.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/review-external-prs/SKILL.md · 192 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed GPL-3.0

The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 192 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A bf7f8ee162fb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-external-prs is a skill published in the GitHub repository solana-foundation/solana-com (504 stars, last pushed today), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 2,065 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.