Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform/main/.agents/skills/sdp-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform/sdp-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform/sdp-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform/sdp-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform/sdp-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform/sdp-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00089 | $0.02874 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01437 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00575 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00287 |
Grade A, and why
sdp-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Digest a change set into short, scannable bullets, then run a focused review pass (reuse, parsing, dependencies, transactions). Not a full correctness review — the code-review and owasp skills cover that.
1. Base style
Read ../sdp-concise/SKILL.md and apply its output contract. This file reference is the shared Claude/Codex source of truth; do not depend on an agent-specific output-style plugin.
2. Pin the change set
Default scope is the current working diff (git diff + git diff --staged + untracked files). If the user names a base (--base <ref>, a branch, a PR number via gh pr diff), diff against that instead. If the working tree is clean and no base was given, diff the current branch against main.
Read enough of the changed files (and their immediate callers) to describe the change accurately — never summarize from filenames alone.
3. Output
Four sections, bullets only, each bullet one line where possible. Plain language first, code refs second.
Product changes — what a user of the dashboard or API can now do / no longer do / sees differently. If a change is purely internal, say "no user-visible change" and one line why the work exists.
How it's implemented — the technical mechanism per product bullet: new/changed routes, DB migrations + tables, services, providers, UI components. Reference as file:line. Call out money-path mechanics (idempotency, transactions, policy gating) explicitly when present.
Domains touched — which SDP domains this crosses: issuance, ramps (per provider), payments/batches, custody wallets, counterparties/compliance, policy, auth/keys, webhooks, dashboard, docs. One bullet per domain with a half-line of what changed there.
Packages used — two lists:
- Workspace packages touched or consumed (
apps/sdp-api,apps/sdp-web,packages/sdp-types,@sdp/payments,@sdp/policy, …) and what for. - External dependencies newly added or leaned on in this change (from
package.jsondiffs and new imports). No new deps → say so in one bullet.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +1 lines 0e031e5cf30e
- 9d ago First seen · 83 lines · 89 tokens per session scan A 42bdf9c992fb
sdp-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository solana-foundation/solana-developer-platform (52 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 89 tokens to every session and 2,874 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…