Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SoliEstre/EstreGenesis --skill eg-interviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SoliEstre/EstreGenesisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/soliestre/estregenesis/eg-interview)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/soliestre/estregenesis/eg-interview"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soliestre/estregenesis/eg-interview.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00839 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00419 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
eg-interview scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 37 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/eg-interview — interview-strategy intake (grill-me lineage)
The top-of-funnel discipline for the human-facing agent: before decomposing or delegating a request, extract what the requester actually needs — by asking, not by assuming. The output is a delegable brief that travels with every downstream delegation, so worker agents execute a confirmed intent instead of an upstream guess.
1. When to run (and when not to)
Run when a request is broad, ambiguous, or high-stakes and will fan out — a program-scale ask, a "make X better" with no criteria, work that commits resources or publishes externally. Do NOT run for requests that are already specific and cheap to redo: interviewing a clear request is over-questioning, which costs requester patience for zero information gain. Rule of thumb: if you can state the purpose, the deliverable, and the success check in one sentence each and would bet on being right, skip the interview and confirm inline instead.
2. What to press for (the six extraction targets)
- Purpose — why this, why now; what changes for the requester when it lands. The stated task is often a means; the purpose is what survives redesign.
- Deliverable shape — what artifact/state counts as the output (a document? a running service? a decision?).
- Constraints — deadline, budget/effort ceiling, technology or policy boundaries, do-not-touch zones.
- Success criteria — how the requester will judge it done; what verification they'd accept.
- Scope edges — what is explicitly in and out; the adjacent work they do not want started.
- Priority trade-offs — when speed, completeness, and cost collide, which yields first.
3. Question discipline
- Batch few, high-yield — 2–4 questions per round, at most ~2 rounds. Each question must change what you'd do next; drop any whose every answer leads to the same plan.
- Default-and-confirm over open-ended — where an answer is inferable, state the inferred default and ask for correction ("기본값 X 로 진행할게요 — 아니면 알려주세요") instead of asking from zero.
- Structured choices where the host supports them — present options with costs/benefits and a recommendation. Compose with Hyperbrief for the presentation register: default the option prose to the plain-language levels (L1.1.1–L1.2.2) and honor an "explain more simply" fallback — the requester picking an option must actually understand it.
- Stop on diminishing returns — when the remaining unknowns are cheaper to resolve by doing (a reversible probe) than by asking, stop interviewing and mark them as assumptions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 37 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 0acee20943c2
eg-interview is a skill published in the GitHub repository SoliEstre/EstreGenesis (8 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 839 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
update-agent-context
This skill should be used to keep CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and the skill files themselves compact, current, and internally consistent. It runs in three phases: Phase 1 performs a one-time structural refactor of CLAUDE.md using a Karpathy-inspired behavioral scaffold and derives AGENTS.md from it by stripping Claude…
watercooler-onboarding
Bootstrap Watercooler memory for a repository by inspecting local code, docs, CI, git history, and existing Watercooler threads, then writing a small set of durable, provenance-backed seed threads that future agents can query and extend. Use when entering a repo for the first time, seeding a repo with Watercooler…
ppgp
Portable Persistent Goal Protocol for long-running coding-agent work. Use when starting, resuming, handing off, distilling, or closing a substantial software goal across long sessions, context compaction, agent replacement, or other Agent Skills-compatible coding-agent environments.
search-threads
Search threads with filters. Supports filters like role:planner, type:Decision, after:2024-01, thread:topic-name, status:OPEN.
watercooler-health
Check watercooler system health — MCP server, baseline graph (T1), git auth, GitHub rate limit, and daemons. Use when syncs break or anything in the watercooler stack behaves unexpectedly.
recall
Recall project context or answer questions about history and decisions. Use before starting work, when investigating unfamiliar code, or asking "What was decided about X?" / "Why did we choose Y?".