Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sonofmagic/weapp-tailwindcss/scientific-critical-thinkingnpx skills add sonofmagic/weapp-tailwindcss --skill scientific-critical-thinkinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sonofmagic/weapp-tailwindcssWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonofmagic/weapp-tailwindcss/scientific-critical-thinking)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sonofmagic/weapp-tailwindcss/scientific-critical-thinking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sonofmagic/weapp-tailwindcss/scientific-critical-thinking.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00040 | $0.04745 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.02372 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00949 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00475 |
Grade A, and why
scientific-critical-thinking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to scientific-critical-thinking — 26 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 586 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scientific Critical Thinking
Overview
Critical thinking is a systematic process for evaluating scientific rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, and evidence quality using GRADE and Cochrane ROB frameworks. Apply this skill for critical analysis of scientific claims.
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Evaluating research methodology and experimental design
- Assessing statistical validity and evidence quality
- Identifying biases and confounding in studies
- Reviewing scientific claims and conclusions
- Conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses
- Applying GRADE or Cochrane risk of bias assessments
- Providing critical analysis of research papers
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
When creating documents with this skill, always consider adding scientific diagrams and schematics to enhance visual communication.
If your document does not already contain schematics or diagrams:
- Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
For new documents: Scientific schematics should be generated by default to visually represent key concepts, workflows, architectures, or relationships described in the text.
How to generate schematics:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
When to add schematics:
- Critical thinking framework diagrams
- Bias identification decision trees
- Evidence quality assessment flowcharts
- GRADE assessment methodology diagrams
- Risk of bias evaluation frameworks
- Validity assessment visualizations
- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 586 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A e1563de3679f
scientific-critical-thinking is a skill published in the GitHub repository sonofmagic/weapp-tailwindcss (1,855 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 4,745 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to scientific-critical-thinking, differing in 26 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
weapp-vite-best-practices
面向采用 weapp-vite 项目布局仓库或已安装 weapp-vite 依赖项目的工程化实践手册，覆盖 vite.config.ts 的 weapp 配置、内置 i18n、自动路由、routeRules/layout、buildScope、自动导入组件、分包、npm、六平台单目标构建、受管 TypeScript、HMR、sourcemap、prepare、MCP、Web runtime、lib mode、worker、AI skills，以及与 weapp-ide-cli 的命令治理边界。.
native-to-weapp-vite-wevu-migration
面向原生微信、支付宝、抖音等小程序渐进迁移到 weapp-vite + 原生 或继续升级到 weapp-vite + wevu + Vue SFC 的结构化工作流，覆盖六平台单目标构建、原生扩展名保留、Web 联调边界、路线选择、工具链接入、SFC 试点、响应式升级与可回滚验证。.
docs-and-website-sync
面向 weapp-vite monorepo 的文档、website 与公开 skills 同步工作流。适用于源码能力变化后同步配置、CLI、React/Wevu/Vue SFC、多平台、mpcore、README、packaged docs、脚手架 AGENTS.md、AI skills 元数据和触发回归入口。.
weapp-vite-vue-sfc-best-practices
面向使用 weapp-vite 的小程序项目的 Vue SFC 实践手册，覆盖 script setup、纯模板 SFC、JSON 宏、definePageMeta/layout、defineModel、usingComponents、内置 i18n Behavior、JSX/TSX script block、模板指令兼容、多平台 SFC、.weapp-vite 类型支持文件与受管 prepare 工作流。.
release-and-changeset-best-practices
面向 weapp-vite monorepo 的 repoctl release、pnpm change intent 与 issue 交付工作流。适用于 weapp-vite、wevu、@weapp-vite/react、mpcore、模板、公开 skills 或 AI 合约变更，判断 change intent、create-weapp-vite 联动、跨平台验证，以及从 issue worktree 到中文 PR/CI 的交付闭环。.
weapp-devtools-e2e-best-practices
面向 weapp-vite 仓库的 WeChat DevTools 与 mpcore headless runtime e2e 工作流。适用于 e2e/ide/、miniprogram-automator、WEAPPVITEE2ERUNTIMEPROVIDER、全局串行、共享 automator、miniProgram.reLaunch(...)、DevTools/headless parity、跨平台 launcher，以及 screenshot/compare/logs 验收。.