Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker/main/.claude/skills/worker-validation-and-qa/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sorryorc/mcp-codex-workerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker/worker-validation-and-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker/worker-validation-and-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker/worker-validation-and-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker/worker-validation-and-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker/worker-validation-and-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00191 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00076 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
worker-validation-and-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Worker Validation And QA
Evidence Bar
- Passing checks prove only the checked behavior.
- A receipt proves runtime execution shape, not semantic correctness.
- A low trajectory score is a review signal.
- Critical tasks need independent semantic review or main-thread review.
Acceptance Checklist
- Relevant tests passed.
- Scope is clean.
- Receipt abnormal verdict is accepted or explicitly handled.
- Episode has no unexpected missing gates.
- No new blocking behavior without
blocking_policy=enforce.
When Not To Use
Do not use this for writing user-facing docs. Use worker-docs-and-writing.
Verification
npm testnpm run codex:guard
Provenance and maintenance
Add failed QA cases to tests before changing acceptance rules.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 7594f4f62890
worker-validation-and-qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository sorryorc/mcp-codex-worker (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 191 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-failure-explorer
Import and query an existing Vitest 3.2 JSON report to explore test failures, file-level errors and original diagnostic evidence.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
unity-agent-workflows
Use for AI-assisted Unity work that needs live repo discovery, project-derived routing, runtime-owner proof, runtime-visible output hard stops, runtime numeric proof for repeated visible-output failures, state-step guards, multi-agent scope ownership, modular C#/asmdef safety, UI/scene/visual asset gates, data-first…
laravel-tdd
Test-driven development for Laravel with PHPUnit and Pest, factories, database testing, fakes, and coverage targets.
browser-qa
A browser-based quality check for deployed web pages and user flows. It uses browser automation to test rendering, navigation, forms, interactions, responsive behaviour, and accessibility-related issues.
eval-harness
An evaluation framework for AI-assisted development that defines pass/fail criteria, measures pass@k reliability, and runs regression checks. Eval-driven development means testing an agent's expected behavior before and after changes, much like tests for software.