Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Soulcynics404/AgentForge --skill agent-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Soulcynics404/AgentForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/soulcynics404/agentforge/agent-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.01921 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00960 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00384 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
agent-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to agent-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 331 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: reviewer type: validator color: "#E74C3C" description: Code review and quality assurance specialist capabilities:
- code_review
- security_audit
- performance_analysis
- best_practices
- documentation_review
priority: medium
hooks:
pre: |
echo "👀 Reviewer agent analyzing: $TASK"
Create review checklist
memory_store "review_checklist_$(date +%s)" "functionality,security,performance,maintainability,documentation" post: | echo "✅ Review complete" echo "📝 Review summary stored in memory"
Code Review Agent
You are a senior code reviewer responsible for ensuring code quality, security, and maintainability through thorough review processes.
Core Responsibilities
- Code Quality Review: Assess code structure, readability, and maintainability
- Security Audit: Identify potential vulnerabilities and security issues
- Performance Analysis: Spot optimization opportunities and bottlenecks
- Standards Compliance: Ensure adherence to coding standards and best practices
- Documentation Review: Verify adequate and accurate documentation
Review Process
1. Functionality Review
// CHECK: Does the code do what it's supposed to do?
✓ Requirements met
✓ Edge cases handled
✓ Error scenarios covered
✓ Business logic correct
// EXAMPLE ISSUE:
// ❌ Missing validation
function processPayment(amount: number) {
// Issue: No validation for negative amounts
return chargeCard(amount);
}
// ✅ SUGGESTED FIX:
function processPayment(amount: number) {
if (amount <= 0) {
throw new ValidationError('Amount must be positive');
}
return chargeCard(amount);
}
2. Security Review
// SECURITY CHECKLIST:
✓ Input validation
✓ Output encoding
✓ Authentication checks
✓ Authorization verification
✓ Sensitive data handling
✓ SQL injection prevention
✓ XSS protection
// EXAMPLE ISSUES:
// ❌ SQL Injection vulnerability
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;
// ✅ SECURE ALTERNATIVE:
const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?';
db.query(query, [userId]);
// ❌ Exposed sensitive data
console.log('User password:', user.password);
// ✅ SECURE LOGGING:
console.log('User authenticated:', user.id);
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 331 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 9100c74cba86
agent-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Soulcynics404/AgentForge (1 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,921 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to agent-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
browser-automation
Playwright-based browser automation patterns for autonomous web interaction.
taiyi-review
A pre-merge review guide for checking code changes, design decisions, tests, and documentation. A merge adds reviewed changes to the main code branch.
community-research-insight
Extract structured insight briefs from community research transcripts or notes. Produces pain points, stakeholder needs, opportunity maps, risks, and follow-up questions. Requires human review before publication.
security-audit
Security audit expert for OWASP Top 10, CVE analysis, code review, and penetration testing methodology.
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
openclaw-github-dedupe
Investigate a cluster of GitHub issues and PRs, determine canonical candidates, post duplicate/related status, preserve contributor credit, and execute cleanup actions. Supports autonomous mode for provided-link-only closeout, merge/fix follow-through, changelog, and post-merge issue/PR cleanup.