Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SpaceMalamute/ai-rules --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SpaceMalamute/ai-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/spacemalamute/ai-rules/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/spacemalamute/ai-rules/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/spacemalamute/ai-rules/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/spacemalamute/ai-rules/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/spacemalamute/ai-rules/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.01113 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00445 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00223 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 117 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 8ac98fb9d42c
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository SpaceMalamute/ai-rules (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,113 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
atomic-review
Compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", or invokes /atomic-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.
review
A combined code review and security audit for proposed code changes. A code review checks quality and maintainability, while a security audit looks for vulnerabilities such as unsafe input handling or weak encryption.
hydra
Use when the user asks for Hydra, a deep multi-perspective code review, architecture or security tradeoffs, blind spots, or iterative re-review. Avoid for simple fixes and lookups.
trace-mcp-refactoring
Safe refactoring workflow using trace-mcp — assess risk, find candidates, check impact, and rename symbols across all files without missing import sites or cross-file references.
fallow
Codebase intelligence for JavaScript and TypeScript. Free static layer reports quality, changed-code risk, cleanup opportunities (unused files, exports, types, dependencies), code duplication, circular dependencies, complexity hotspots, architecture boundary violations, and feature flag patterns. Runtime coverage…
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…