Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sponge-b0b/Polaris. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sponge-b0b/Polaris/main/.agents/skills/review-spec-remediation/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sponge-b0b/PolarisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sponge-b0b/polaris/review-spec-remediation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sponge-b0b/polaris/review-spec-remediation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sponge-b0b/polaris/review-spec-remediation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sponge-b0b/polaris/review-spec-remediation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sponge-b0b/polaris/review-spec-remediation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.02743 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01372 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00549 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00274 |
Grade A, and why
review-spec-remediation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 365 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Spec Remediation
$review-spec-remediation is invoked only by $review-spec after a current Pending Review Remediation packet is persisted.
It converts already validated review findings and scope corrections into durable remediation state.
It does not review source, create new findings, fix implementation, or independently change finding scope/axis authority.
Certified Domain Reconciliation Gate
This section is authoritative and supersedes preserved wording below that allows a later review to enlarge a previously certified semantic root/domain merely by labeling the new surface a root-definition gap or missed prior finding.
For every current Blocking finding mapped to a previously satisfied/closed root, the Pending packet must include one current $review-spec Domain Finality Reconciliation disposition:
Candidate: <finding/member>
Prior certified domain: <domain ID / durable certification reference>
Authority changed: yes | no
Membership under frozen predicate: in-domain | out-of-domain | ambiguous
Explicit authority contradiction: <None | exact source>
Finality disposition:
in-domain-falsifier
authority-changed-domain-stale
closure-authority-defect
domain-expansion
Consume that disposition mechanically:
in-domain-falsifier— eligible for ordinary current remediation reconciliation (missed prior findingorregressionas provenance proves);authority-changed-domain-stale— eligible only after the Pending packet identifies the actual changed authority and the current review rebuilt the affected domain from that new authority;closure-authority-defect— not implementation remediation. Preserve the observation and halt the affected root/cell behind explicit authority/domain reconciliation; do not pass it to$to-tickets;domain-expansion— non-actionable for the current certified domain. Preserve the observation historically but do not create/open a remediation cell or root from it.
A full fresh re-review, missing review-proof reuse ledger, stronger challenger, or broader plausible interpretation does not invalidate a certified closure domain by itself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +66 lines e39e495103f2
- 12d ago First seen · 299 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 779c52a84c25
review-spec-remediation is a skill published in the GitHub repository sponge-b0b/Polaris (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 2,743 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…