Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add srnichols/plan-forge --skill forge-quenchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/srnichols/plan-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/srnichols/plan-forge/forge-quench)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/srnichols/plan-forge/forge-quench"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/srnichols/plan-forge/forge-quench/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/srnichols/plan-forge/forge-quench"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/srnichols/plan-forge/forge-quench.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01734 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00694 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00347 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00173 |
Grade A, and why
forge-quench scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Forge Quench — Code Simplification Skill
Named after the metallurgical quenching process — rapidly cooling hot metal simplifies its crystal structure and hardens it.
Trigger
"Simplify this code" / "Reduce complexity" / "Clean up before review" / "Quench this module" / "Code is too complex"
Steps
1. Measure Complexity
Identify the most complex functions in the target files. Use language-appropriate static analysis:
# Generic: count lines per function, nesting depth, branches
# Stack-specific variants override this step with proper tools
grep -rn "function\|def \|func \|fn \|public.*(" <target> | head -20
List the top 3–5 most complex functions by:
- Line count (functions >50 lines)
- Nesting depth (>3 levels of indentation)
- Branch count (>5 if/else/switch branches)
- Parameter count (>4 parameters)
If no functions exceed thresholds: Report "No simplification candidates found" and STOP with a PASS.
2. Understand First (Chesterton's Fence)
Before simplifying ANY code, document WHY the complexity exists.
For each candidate function:
- Read the git blame to find when and why it was written
- Check if comments explain the reasoning
- Look for edge cases the complexity handles (null checks, retry logic, fallback paths)
- Document your understanding in a brief note
| Function | Lines | Why Complex | Still Valid? | Action |
|----------|-------|-------------|-------------|--------|
| processOrder() | 87 | Handles 3 payment providers + retry | Yes — 3 providers still active | Simplify: extract per-provider strategies |
| validateInput() | 62 | Legacy regex for 5 country formats | Partially — 2 formats deprecated | Simplify: remove deprecated formats |
| buildReport() | 45 | Single function, low nesting | N/A — not complex enough | Skip |
If the reason is still valid and the complexity is necessary: Leave it alone. Document WHY you're leaving it and move on. Not all complexity is bad.
3. Propose Simplifications
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago Changed · -8 lines · -4 tokens per session 5b9fad96c3ae
- 1mo ago First seen · 172 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A d209d014d49d
forge-quench is a skill published in the GitHub repository srnichols/plan-forge (6 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,734 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-analysis
Use the free built-in .NET SDK analyzers and analysis levels with gradual Roslyn warning promotion. USE FOR: the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers; CI should fail on analyzer warnings; the team needs AnalysisLevel or AnalysisMode guidance. DO NOT USE FOR: third-party analyzer selection by itself; formatting-only…
graphify-dotnet
Use graphify-dotnet to generate codebase knowledge graphs, architecture snapshots, and exportable repository maps from .NET or polyglot source trees, with optional AI-enriched semantic relationships. USE FOR: graphify commands; graph JSON, HTML, SVG, Cypher, Markdown, and Obsidian exports; repository map and…
sonarjs
Use SonarJS-derived rules in .NET repositories that ship JavaScript or TypeScript frontends and need deeper bug-risk, code-smell, or cognitive-complexity checks than a minimal ESLint baseline. USE FOR: SonarQube, SonarCloud, or eslint-plugin-sonarjs setups; frontend code smells; cognitive complexity and deeper…
complexity
Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. USE FOR: the team wants to find overly complex methods; cyclomatic complexity thresholds are needed in CI; maintainability metrics or coupling thresholds need to be configured. DO NOT USE…
resharper-clt
Use the free official JetBrains ReSharper Command Line Tools for .NET repositories. USE FOR: jb inspectcode; jb cleanupcode; stronger C# inspections, cleanup profiles, and CI-friendly JetBrains analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing tests with inspection output; ad-hoc formatting-only work when the repo intentionally…
roslynator
Use the open-source free Roslynator analyzer packages and optional CLI for .NET. USE FOR: Roslynator.Analyzers setup; Roslynator CLI checks or cleanup; C# linting, static analysis, and code-fix automation. DO NOT USE FOR: overlapping analyzer packs with no consolidation plan; formatting-only work owned by another…