Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m --skill experiment-suitegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-mWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m/experiment-suite)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m/experiment-suite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m/experiment-suite/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m/experiment-suite"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m/experiment-suite.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.02769 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.01108 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00554 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00277 |
Grade A, and why
experiment-suite scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to experiment-suite — 42 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Experiment Suite
Overview
End-to-end experiment package builder. Single stage, full quality from the start. The agent (Claude Code / Cursor / Aider / Codex / …) writes everything directly using its own tools (Write, Bash, WebFetch, …). This skill contains procedure + reference playbooks + figure-example scripts — no Python runtime, no LLM SDK.
The substantive work is decomposed into reference playbooks under references/:
| Reference | Topic |
|---|---|
references/00-incremental-execution.md |
how to do this without losing work: batches, persistence, resume — read first |
references/01-design-depth.md |
what a real experiment design contains (motivation → hypothesis → datasets → baselines → metrics → ablations → budget) |
references/01a-data-contract.md |
runtime dataset binding: source, access route, version, split, and reuse boundary |
references/02-code-quality.md |
code-skeleton standards — runnable model.py, data.py, train.py, evaluate.py |
references/03-results-protocol.md |
results.json schema; measured / simulated / illustrative provenance |
references/04-publication-figures.md |
publication-grade charts, multi-panel layouts, taste rules |
references/04a-figure-contract.md |
figure logic before plotting: conclusion, panel map, reviewer risk |
references/04b-figure-qa.md |
export bundle, editable text, statistics and image-integrity QA |
references/05-report-structure.md |
structured experiment_report.md (problem → design → method → results → analysis → limitations) |
references/06-quality-gate.md |
self-check before delivery |
Also: figure_examples/ — publication-style matplotlib scripts plus a shared style kit the agent can use as starting points.
Read the relevant reference before writing, not after. The full pass does not fit in a single turn — references/00-incremental-execution.md is the only execution mode that completes.
When to Use
- User wants to "design an experiment" for a research question.
- User needs runnable code for a specific task (classification / forecasting / detection / …).
- User wants to compare methods and have a structured report at the end.
- User needs publication-quality figures of experimental results.
What ships with it
17 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- figure_examples/FIGURE_CONTRACT_TEMPLATE.md 249 B
- figure_examples/make_fig_02_horizon_sweep.py 1.3 KB runs code
- figure_examples/make_fig_03_heatmap.py 1.6 KB runs code
- figure_examples/make_fig_04_ablation.py 2.1 KB runs code
- figure_examples/README.md 1.3 KB
- figure_examples/requirements.txt 145 B
- figure_examples/style_kit.py 2.6 KB runs code
- references/00-incremental-execution.md 4.5 KB
- references/01-design-depth.md 5.9 KB
- references/01a-data-contract.md 3.0 KB
- references/02-code-quality.md 8.3 KB
- references/03-results-protocol.md 7.1 KB
- references/04-publication-figures.md 6.9 KB
- references/04a-figure-contract.md 1.6 KB
- references/04b-figure-qa.md 1.4 KB
- references/05-report-structure.md 5.7 KB
- references/06-quality-gate.md 6.3 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 201 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 44fffe0dfbfe
experiment-suite is a skill published in the GitHub repository ssmurfgg04-gif/context-m (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 2,769 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to experiment-suite, differing in 42 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-memory-discipline
Rules for when an agent should recall from long-term memory before acting and when it should save decisions, corrections and failures afterwards. Works with any memory backend.
reward-design
A guide to defining the scores that an AI agent receives during trial-and-error training. It covers checks based on rules, human preferences, or another model, and distinguishes rewarding the final result from rewarding the steps taken.
causal
Analyze cause-and-effect relationships in the Semantica knowledge graph — causal chains, interventions, counterfactuals, and causal influence scores.
post-training-strategy
A guide to choosing and planning ways to improve an AI model after its initial training. It explains when to add knowledge, teach a response format, use trial-and-error training, or use a smaller model to learn from a larger one.
ai-style
A Chinese-language writing guide for producing or revising reader-facing text such as product announcements, public-account articles, emails, and README files. It focuses on reducing patterns that make writing sound machine-generated.
agent-evolution
A guide to making an AI agent improve from its past runs. It covers how to judge results, extract reusable lessons, and decide whether to store them as knowledge, instructions, code, or model training.