stagewise is an open-source agentic IDE that combines a coding agent, browser-based app previews, debugging tools, and git workflows in one development environment. Developers use it to build and inspect applications with models from different providers. Catalogue add-ons extend the IDE's agent workflows.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add stagewise-io/stagewise --skill githubgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stagewise-io/stagewiseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stagewise-io/stagewise/github)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stagewise-io/stagewise/github"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stagewise-io/stagewise/github/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stagewise-io/stagewise/github"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stagewise-io/stagewise/github.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 3 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 8 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Privilege Escalation · line 28 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.02664 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.01066 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00533 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00266 |
Grade A, and why
github scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 307 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A d7e05db8c6a7
github is a skill published in the GitHub repository stagewise-io/stagewise (6,831 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 2,664 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-ops
GitHub CLI for issues, PRs, code search, CI logs, releases, and API queries. Requires gh CLI and auth.
ship-it
Worktree-side implementation orchestrator for an OpenSpec change. Idempotent: gates automated scenarios on filesystem reality, owns the red-test fix loop, runs the docker harness with always-teardown, then drives ship-change inline. Escape hatch writes SHIPITBLOCKED.md. Runnable headless. Triggers: "ship it", "build…
release-cut
Cut a new pi-agent-dashboard release: promote ## [Unreleased] in CHANGELOG.md, bump every workspace package.json per SemVer, commit, tag v , and push — triggering the Release workflow that publishes every non-private workspace, builds the Electron artifacts, and creates a GitHub Release. Use on "cut a release"…
release-revoke
Revoke or rollback a pi-agent-dashboard release: delete the GitHub Release, remove the git tag locally and on origin, deprecate the npm version (npm unpublish is blocked after 72h), and optionally revert the release commit. Use when the user says "revoke release", "rollback release", "delete release", "unpublish…
ship-change
Ship an OpenSpec change after openspec-apply completes. When only QA/manual tasks remain, marks them done (tested later), archives + syncs specs, commits, pushes, opens a PR against develop, watches CI, waits for CodeRabbit, auto-applies safe fixes and re-pushes, loops until CI green + no actionable review threads…
team-pr
Use for opening PRs only on explicit request. Never infer from passed verification. Includes project terms, evidence, and risk.