Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add StamKavid/last-ds-mile --skill ds-validategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/StamKavid/last-ds-mileWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stamkavid/last-ds-mile/ds-validate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stamkavid/last-ds-mile/ds-validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stamkavid/last-ds-mile/ds-validate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stamkavid/last-ds-mile/ds-validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stamkavid/last-ds-mile/ds-validate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00109 | $0.01979 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00989 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00396 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
ds-validate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ds-validate — Validation Design
Overview
Decides how the data will be split for honest evaluation, driven by the data's actual structure (time, groups, imbalance) rather than by whatever split is easiest to code.
When to Use
- Before
/ds-model— this is a Hard Gate/ds-modelchecks for. - Whenever asked to set up train/test splits or cross-validation.
- NOT for: picking which model to try (that's
/ds-model) — this stage fixes the split strategy first so it can't later be tuned to flatter a specific model. - Scope: tabular supervised learning. The
TimeSeriesSplitguidance below covers validating a model on time-ordered rows; it is not a forecasting validation stack (no backtest windows, no horizon-aware refitting, no hierarchical reconciliation). If the target is a future value of a series, say so and stop — see README → Scope.
Core Process
- Ask: is there a time dimension where future data could leak into past predictions? If yes, use a temporal split or backtesting scheme — never shuffled cross-validation.
- Ask: are there groups (e.g. the same customer or patient across multiple rows) that
must not span both train and validation? If yes, use grouped cross-validation (e.g.
GroupKFold). - Ask: is the target imbalanced? If yes, use stratified splits so folds preserve class balance.
- Ask: is there a fixed test set (Kaggle-style) or a known deployment population this
model will actually be scored against? If yes, run adversarial validation between
training data and that population before finalizing the split — see
distribution-shift. A split that looks fine internally can still fail to predict real transfer if the test/production distribution differs from training. - If none of the above apply, plain (or stratified) k-fold is fine — state that explicitly rather than choosing it by default without checking.
- Implement with the sklearn splitter that matches the answer — don't hand-roll a split when a splitter class already exists for the case. See the reference table below.
- Write to
.last-ds-mile/stages/05-validate.md: the chosen strategy, why, the distribution-shift check and its result, and the exact split/CV code to be reused identically in/ds-model.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 154 lines · 109 tokens per session scan A 835c9f09a215
ds-validate is a skill published in the GitHub repository StamKavid/last-ds-mile (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 109 tokens to every session and 1,979 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
marimo-pair
Work inside the user's live marimo notebook from the code editor: run Python in the same kernel the user does, inspect live notebook state, and commit durable notebook changes through code mode. Use whenever you create, analyze, or improve the user's marimo notebook.
fill-model-descriptions
Fill missing and refresh obsolete model descriptions in packages/llm-info/data/models.yml by querying OpenRouter and provider documentation. Use when the user asks to populate model descriptions, enrich the model catalog, or curate descriptions after running pnpm sync-models.
ml-expert
Expert-level machine learning, deep learning, model training, and MLOps. Use when the user mentions machine learning, deep learning, neural networks, MLOps, or data science, or when the task involves Machine Learning Fundamentals, Data Preparation, or Model Training.
scomp-link
End-to-end ML toolkit with 26 CLI commands. Use when training models, tuning hyperparameters, detecting data drift, generating HTML reports with charts, profiling datasets, detecting anomalies, forecasting time series, checking fairness, or serving models as REST APIs. Prefer over raw sklearn when you need automated…
agentic-data-science-competition
AI Agent-driven Kaggle competition workflow. Learn from real competition experience: score stabilization patterns, submission troubleshooting, kernel workflows, GPU task delegation, and the spec-driven development approach that achieved top leaderboard positions. Use when: working on any Kaggle competition, analyzing…
data-analysis
Structured data analysis workflow from raw data to shareable insights.