sumi-docs: Skill for Codex

.agents/skills/sumi-docs-audit/SKILL.md

sumi-docs-audit is a skill for Codex from starSumi/sumi-docs. It costs 90 tokens per session (1,749 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of sumi-docs-audit, MIT.

A read-only review method for Sumi Docs, a documentation repository and its related services, websites, content rules, and publishing setup.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess a release candidate or the architecture and source-of-truth consistency across the repository, MCP service, Web site, documents, and publishing workspace.
Why use it?
It provides evidence about repository health and consistency without changing source files, settings, Git state, or hosted services. A monorepo is one repository containing multiple related projects.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: mentions Claude Code; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions AGENTS.md.

This is starSumi/sumi-docs's own configuration. It tells Codex how to work on sumi-docs itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything sumi-docs configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to starSumi/sumi-docs. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/starSumi/sumi-docs/main/.agents/skills/sumi-docs-audit/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/starSumi/sumi-docs

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for sumi-docs-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/starsumi/sumi-docs/sumi-docs-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/starsumi/sumi-docs/sumi-docs-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/starsumi/sumi-docs/sumi-docs-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/starsumi/sumi-docs/sumi-docs-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for sumi-docs-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/starsumi/sumi-docs/sumi-docs-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/starsumi/sumi-docs/sumi-docs-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 90 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,749 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00090 $0.01749
Opus 5 $0.00045 $0.00874
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00350
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00175

Measured 10d ago against content hash d1c9bb84f5c4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

sumi-docs-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to sumi-docs-audit — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.agents/skills/sumi-docs-audit/SKILL.md · 161 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Audit Sumi Docs

Return one compact, findings-first audit of the live target. Treat the audit as read-only: do not modify source, configuration, Git state, GitHub state, or host state; do not install or update tools. Repository validation may refresh only its normal ignored build outputs. Return the report to the caller by default. Write a report only when the user names an ignored artifacts/ destination.

Bind the evidence snapshot

Read the root and nearest nested AGENTS.md before selecting checks. Resolve the target rather than inferring it from an earlier report:

git rev-parse --show-toplevel
git rev-parse HEAD
git branch --show-current
git status --porcelain=v2 --branch
node --version
pnpm --version

Record the UTC timestamp, operating system, target path, HEAD, branch, tree cleanliness, tool versions, commands, exit codes, and skipped checks. Inspect staged, unstaged, and untracked paths when the tree is dirty. Attribute results to HEAD only for a clean tree; otherwise identify the audited snapshot as HEAD plus the listed worktree changes and keep commit evidence separate from worktree evidence.

Use current source, tests, generated artifact contents, GitHub checks, and live probes in that order of relevance. Treat docs/history/ and package history snapshots as non-authoritative. Redact secret values and machine-specific absolute paths from the report.

Select the audit profile

  • For a repository health audit, cover every applicable ownership boundary and run the root validation gates.
  • For a release-candidate audit, also bind the candidate commit and artifacts, inspect the current candidate workflow and public checks, and verify the packaging, compliance, performance, publication, and rollback evidence that the candidate claims.
  • For an architecture consistency audit, trace each affected contract from its authority through generated projections, consumers, tests, and operational documentation. Do not replace runtime evidence with an architecture diagram.
  • For a PR, commit, or branch diff, use $sumi-docs-pr. For a security-only scan, use the available security audit workflow. For a single failure, run a focused diagnosis rather than expanding it into a repository audit.

Read the full file on GitHub · 161 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 161 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A d1c9bb84f5c4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

sumi-docs-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository starSumi/sumi-docs (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 1,749 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to sumi-docs-audit, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

writing-emdash-docs

Write, revise, and review EmDash documentation for technical accuracy, useful structure, house style, and natural prose. Use when working on user documentation, guides, API reference pages, migration or upgrade guides, READMEs, contributor documentation, technical specifications, or release notes in the EmDash…

emdash-cms/emdash · 85 tokens

triage-contributor-pr

Triage open pull requests from external contributors to prisma/prisma and produce a per-PR verdict with evidence. Use when a maintainer asks to triage, evaluate, assess, or review the queue of incoming contributor PRs, to decide whether a fork PR is safe to run CI on, to check whether a PR is in scope for its version…

prisma/orm · 131 tokens

review-implement-phase

Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.

prisma/orm · 38 tokens

review-triage-phase

Produces canonical review actions from fetched review state and renders action markdown. Use when the user wants only triage/action-planning for the review-framework workflow.

prisma/orm · 36 tokens

update-pr

Update the pull request for the current session. Use when the user wants to push new changes to an existing PR.

microsoft/vscode · 26 tokens

review

Review one pull request for real bugs, regressions, and convention violations. Enumerate candidate issues across the whole diff, verify each against the code, then return structured line-anchored findings and a verdict. Read-only on GitHub; the orchestrator posts the review.

emdash-cms/emdash · 57 tokens