property-based-testing

A testing approach that generates many inputs to check whether a rule always holds, instead of testing only a few chosen examples.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to write, review, or debug tests for round trips, inverse operations, invariants, sorting, and similar rules with a clear expected property.
Why use it?
It can uncover unusual counterexamples in code that handles broad input ranges, such as parsers or data conversions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/stefaniuk/loadout/property-based-testing
Any agent
npx skills add stefaniuk/loadout --skill property-based-testing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stefaniuk/loadout

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 183 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 997 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00183 $0.00997
Opus 5 $0.00092 $0.00498
Sonnet 5 $0.00037 $0.00199
Haiku 4.5 $0.00018 $0.00100

Measured 2d ago against content hash 9448cacb65c6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

property-based-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/skills/property-based-testing/SKILL.md · 69 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Property-Based Testing

An example test asserts one point. A property asserts a rule over the whole input domain and lets the generator hunt for the counterexample. That trade is worth making when the code has an algebraic shape — an inverse, an invariant, an oracle — and not otherwise. Code with no such shape gets example tests; saying so is a valid outcome.

Check first whether the shape is missing or merely buried. A calculation wrapped in I/O, a string built by concatenation, an in-place mutation — each has a property and no seam to assert it through. See references/refactoring.md before concluding there is nothing to assert.

Property catalog

Property Formula Where it applies
Roundtrip decode(encode(x)) == x Serialization, conversion pairs
Inverse f(g(x)) == x encrypt/decrypt, compress/decompress
Oracle new(x) == reference(x) Optimization, refactoring, reimplementation
Idempotence f(f(x)) == f(x) Normalization, formatting, sorting
Invariant Holds before and after Any transformation, contract state
Easy to verify is_sorted(sort(x)) Complex algorithms with cheap checkers
Commutativity f(a, b) == f(b, a) Binary and set operations
Associativity f(f(a,b), c) == f(a, f(b,c)) Combining operations
Identity f(x, e) == x Operations with a neutral element

Strength ordering, weakest to strongest: no crash → type preservation → invariant → idempotence → roundtrip / oracle.

Assert the strongest property the code supports. "No crash" alone rarely justifies the dependency — if that is all you can find, either a small rearrangement exposes something stronger, or the honest report is that this code is a poor PBT candidate. Rule out the first before settling for the second.

The two ways a property test asserts nothing

  • Tautology. assert add(a, b) == a + b restates the implementation; no bug they share can fail it. Pick a property that constrains the function without recomputing it. Note the exception: f(x) == f(x) is a genuine determinism property when f is not obviously pure — serializers over dicts or sets, hashing, anything reading the clock.
  • Vacuity. assume() that filters out nearly every input passes without exercising anything, and self-contradictory assume() passes having run zero cases. Push constraints into the strategy so the generator produces valid inputs directly.

Read the full file on GitHub · 69 lines

Files

What ships with it

8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 69 lines · 183 tokens per session scan A 9448cacb65c6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

property-based-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository stefaniuk/loadout (1 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 183 tokens to every session and 997 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.