test-coverage-gap-finder

test-coverage-gap-finder is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from StefanTheCode/dotnet-ai-toolkit. It costs 104 tokens per session (618 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review guide for finding important missing tests in .NET projects. It examines code and optional coverage reports, which show how much code tests exercise.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to identify untested public types, skipped if/else or switch paths, and risky payment, authentication, calculation, or state-changing code.
Why use it?
A high overall coverage percentage can still leave critical code or branches untested, so it ranks gaps by risk instead of counting coverage alone.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/stefanthecode/dotnet-ai-toolkit/test-coverage-gap-finder
Any agent
npx skills add StefanTheCode/dotnet-ai-toolkit --skill test-coverage-gap-finder
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/StefanTheCode/dotnet-ai-toolkit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for test-coverage-gap-finder

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stefanthecode/dotnet-ai-toolkit/test-coverage-gap-finder.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefanthecode/dotnet-ai-toolkit/test-coverage-gap-finder)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stefanthecode/dotnet-ai-toolkit/test-coverage-gap-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stefanthecode/dotnet-ai-toolkit/test-coverage-gap-finder.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 104 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 618 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00104 $0.00618
Opus 5 $0.00052 $0.00309
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00124
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00062

Measured 3d ago against content hash 3afbd774bcd9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-coverage-gap-finder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/test-coverage-gap-finder/SKILL.md · 45 lines

What it actually says

Test Coverage Gap Finder

Find where tests are actually missing and prioritize by risk — so effort goes to the code that matters, not chasing a coverage percentage.

Input — point it at your project / coverage report

Works on a target: a project or GitHub URL, and optionally a coverage report (coverage.cobertura.xml, lcov). Map code vs tests:

grep -rln "public class\|public record" --include=*.cs <target> | grep -vi "Tests"
find <target> -iname "*Tests.cs" -o -iname "*.Tests.csproj"
# if a coverage file exists, parse it for low/zero-covered members

Generate coverage if asked: dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage".

How it prioritizes (risk, not vanity %)

  1. Untested public types with real logic — services, handlers, domain methods, validators. High priority.
  2. Uncovered branches in covered classes — the if/else/switch arms tests skip (where bugs hide).
  3. Complex/critical code — payment, auth, calculations, state transitions — weighted up even if partly covered.
  4. Deprioritize — DTOs/POCOs, generated code, trivial getters: low value to test.

Output

## Coverage gaps (ranked)
🔴 <Type> — no tests; contains <business logic> → suggest: <key cases>
🟡 <Type.Method> — branch `<condition>` uncovered → add case
🟢 (skip) <DTOs / generated / trivial>
## Suggested next 5 tests
1. ...  (hand off to xunit-test-generator)

Principles

  • Coverage % is a vanity metric. 100% of trivial code is worthless; 60% covering all the risky branches is great.
  • Prioritize by risk × complexity, not line count.
  • A gap in a payment/auth path outranks ten gaps in DTOs.
  • Don't recommend tests for code that can't meaningfully fail.

How to use it & best prompts

"What's not tested in this project", "where should I add tests next", "analyze my coverage report and prioritize", "find untested business logic". Hands off to xunit-test-generator and test-data-builder-generator.

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 45 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 3afbd774bcd9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-coverage-gap-finder is a skill published in the GitHub repository StefanTheCode/dotnet-ai-toolkit (19 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 618 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens