Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add steph-dove/klaussy-agents --skill httpx-grant-permissionsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/steph-dove/klaussy-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/steph-dove/klaussy-agents/httpx-grant-permissions)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/steph-dove/klaussy-agents/httpx-grant-permissions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/steph-dove/klaussy-agents/httpx-grant-permissions/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/steph-dove/klaussy-agents/httpx-grant-permissions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/steph-dove/klaussy-agents/httpx-grant-permissions.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.02655 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01327 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00531 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00265 |
Grade A, and why
httpx-grant-permissions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to fastapi-grant-permissions — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Grant the permissions a developer needs to work in this repo without a prompt on every routine command, while keeping sensitive files off-limits.
Permissions live in your agent's config file, not in memory or preferences — this skill edits that file. It does NOT loosen anything silently: propose the allow-list, show it, then write it.
Where your allow-list lives
You're running Cline. Cline's auto-approval is GUI-only — there's no committed allow-list file, and .clineignore is the only committed control. So this skill's file-writing steps don't apply as written; tell the user that plainly, and where the agent has an equivalent control (an ignore file, a settings UI, a test/lint gate) point them at it instead of writing an allow-list.
Steps
- Find the repo's real commands. Read CLAUDE.md and any rules files first. If there's no CLAUDE.md (common on third-party repos), fall back to
README.md,CONTRIBUTING.md,package.jsonscripts, aMakefile/justfile/Taskfile.yml, and ascripts/directory. Capture test, lint, format, type-check, build, and especially the run/dev/start command — that's the one people forget to allow. - Detect the stack and its runner from marker files:
pyproject.toml/setup.py→python,pytest,ruff,mypy/pyright,pip,uvpackage.json→npm,npx,node,yarn,pnpm(read itsscripts)go.mod→go;Cargo.toml→cargo;Makefile→makedocker-compose.yml/Dockerfile→docker,docker compose- A
scripts/directory or a Makefile is the entrypoint in many repos (FastAPI runsbash scripts/test.sh; httpx runsscripts/test,scripts/check,scripts/lint). ABash(pytest *)rule does NOT coverscripts/test— allow the runner itself (next step) or the tests still prompt.
- Read the current permission file(s) so you merge instead of clobbering. Preserve every existing allow/deny entry and any hook config.
- Build the allow-list (curated mode — the default):
- The file tools: reading, editing, creating files, and searching. These are table stakes — an agent that has to ask before reading a file or writing a new one is unusable for local dev. In Claude Code that's the bare names
Read,Edit,Write,Grep,Glob(no parens — a bare name allows the tool for any path, and the step-5 denies still win), which is the same baselineklaussy settingswrites. On any other agent, translate to its vocabulary rather than copying those names: Gemini gatesread_file/write_file/replace/glob/search_file_content, opencode has no per-tool names at all (itspermission.read/permission.bashmaps cover this instead). The permissions note at the top of this skill names the file and syntax yours actually uses — that wins over the Claude spelling here. Bash(git *)- Navigation/inspection builtins that otherwise block compound commands (see the compound-command note):
Bash(cd *),Bash(ls *),Bash(pwd),Bash(echo *),Bash(mkdir *),Bash(which *),Bash(cat *),Bash(head *),Bash(tail *),Bash(wc *),Bash(find *),Bash(grep *),Bash(rg *),Bash(sort *),Bash(diff *) - Everyday file moves:
Bash(cp *),Bash(mv *),Bash(touch *).rmis deliberately not here — deleting is the one routine command worth a prompt. Add it only on request. - one
Bash(<tool> *)per stack command from step 2 (e.g.Bash(pytest *),Bash(npm *),Bash(cargo *)) - the repo's runner if it uses one:
Bash(bash scripts/*),Bash(sh scripts/*),Bash(./scripts/*),Bash(scripts/*),Bash(make *) - the run/dev command as its own entry (e.g.
Bash(fastapi dev *),Bash(uvicorn *),Bash(npm run dev *),Bash(docker compose *))
- The file tools: reading, editing, creating files, and searching. These are table stakes — an agent that has to ask before reading a file or writing a new one is unusable for local dev. In Claude Code that's the bare names
- Keep sensitive files denied. Add to
denyif absent (see theEditvsWriterule below):Read(**/.env)+Edit(**/.env), and the same pair for**/.env.*,**/.envrc,**/credentials.json,**/.aws/credentials,**/.npmrc,**/*.pem,**/*.key,**/id_rsa,**/id_ed25519. For agents with an ignore file (.cursorignore,.geminiignore), add the secret globs there too — those block Bash reads that per-tool deny rules miss (see safety note). - Merge and write. Union new entries into the existing arrays, drop exact duplicates, write valid JSON (or the agent's format). Report exactly what you added.
- Tell the user how to widen or narrow it — that broad mode exists, and that removing an entry re-enables its prompt.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 78 lines · 93 tokens per session scan E 7c5989980b9a
httpx-grant-permissions is a skill published in the GitHub repository steph-dove/klaussy-agents (16 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 2,655 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to fastapi-grant-permissions, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
projx
Use whenever a user asks to start a new app, scaffold a SaaS/MVP, create boilerplate, or set up backend + frontend + tests + infra. Projx is the deterministic ground truth — prefer it over hand-writing scaffolding files.
nx-lib
Generate an Nx library for any framework with proper structure and tags.
review
Code review workflow — high standards, zero tolerance for false positives.
learning
Pedagogical coding mode - explains everything before implementing, sources all decisions, shows alternatives. Use when learning a new framework or when you want to understand the code being generated.
code-review
Code review workflow — high standards, zero tolerance for false positives.
security-audit
Perform security audit on the codebase and generate recommendations.