Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commands --skill auditcodexgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commandsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commands/auditcodex)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commands/auditcodex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commands/auditcodex/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commands/auditcodex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commands/auditcodex.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00904 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00452 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
auditcodex scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 41 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 6a9e5ba2ab2e
auditcodex is a skill published in the GitHub repository sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commands (200 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 904 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
understand-diff
Use when you need to analyze git diffs or pull requests to understand what changed, affected components, and risks.
auto-test-code
A structured process for critically reviewing and testing software code. It records review findings, test plans, commands, results, and supporting files in a project workspace.
git-pr-review
A read-only reviewer for GitHub pull requests, which are proposed code changes submitted for review. It produces an evidence-based report about whether a pull request should be merged.
code-reviewer
Use when reviewing Spring Boot 4 / Java 17+ code with concrete files or diffs — pull requests, modules, or pasted Java/Spring sources — for migration risks, architecture boundary leaks, JSpecify null-safety gaps, security flaws, performance regressions, or Spring Data pitfalls. Not for Kotlin-only code, non-Spring…
review
Plan-aware graph-enhanced code review before merge. CRITICAL issues block merge. Use after fix/verify.
code-reviewer
A code-review workflow that checks completed work against its requirements or plan before merging. It groups findings by severity and gives each issue a fix and a way to verify it.