requesting-code-review

requesting-code-review is a skill for Claude Code from strigov/superpowers-strigov-ver. It costs 22 tokens per session (1,607 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for asking another agent to review completed code changes. The review checks whether the implementation meets its requirements before integration.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after implementation tasks, major features, or before merging a branch, using the correct base and current Git revisions.
Why use it?
It provides an independent check for missed requirements, defects, and risky changes. Reviewing before merging can catch problems while they are still easier to fix.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions subagents; positional $N argument.

Part of the superpowers-strigov-ver plugin — 16 skills, 1 command shipped together

Good fit Use it after implementation tasks, major features, or before merging a branch, using the correct base and current Git revisions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/strigov/superpowers-strigov-ver/requesting-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add strigov/superpowers-strigov-ver --skill requesting-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/strigov/superpowers-strigov-ver

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install superpowers-strigov-ver, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 16 skills, 1 command.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for requesting-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/strigov/superpowers-strigov-ver/requesting-code-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/strigov/superpowers-strigov-ver/requesting-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/strigov/superpowers-strigov-ver/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/strigov/superpowers-strigov-ver/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,607 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.01607
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00804
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00321
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00161

Measured 7d ago against content hash ac894d0f23ad, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md · 160 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Requesting Code Review

Dispatch an Opus subagent to review code changes. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.

Core principle: Review early, review often. Code review is judgment work — always run it on Opus.

When to Request Review

Mandatory:

  • After each task in subagent-driven development
  • After completing major feature
  • Before merge to main

Optional but valuable:

  • When stuck (fresh perspective)
  • Before refactoring (baseline check)
  • After fixing complex bug

How to Request

1. Get git SHAs:

BASE_SHA=<the SHA you recorded before the task started>  # or: $(git merge-base origin/main HEAD)
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

Never HEAD~1 as BASE for multi-commit work — it silently drops all but the last commit of a multi-commit task. If you did not record the task's starting SHA, use the merge-base with the mainline, not a fixed number of parents.

Optionally, pre-build a review package so the reviewer reads one file instead of re-running git. Resolve the script the same way codex-invocation resolves $DISPATCH:

PKG="$(command -v review-package || true)"
[ -z "$PKG" ] && PKG="$(ls -1d ~/.claude/plugins/cache/strigov-cc-plugins/superpowers-strigov-ver/*/bin/review-package 2>/dev/null | sort -rV | head -1)"
[ -z "$PKG" ] && PKG="$(pwd)/bin/review-package"
"$PKG" "$BASE_SHA" "$HEAD_SHA"   # prints: wrote <path>: N commit(s), M bytes

Pass the printed path as {DIFF_FILE}. Only the wrote ... line enters your context — never read the package yourself.

2. Dispatch Opus subagent:

Read the template at ./code-reviewer.md, fill the placeholders, then dispatch:

Agent(
  subagent_type="general-purpose",
  model="opus",
  description="Code review: <short scope>",
  prompt=<filled template>
)

Placeholders:

  • {WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED} - What you just built
  • {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do
  • {BASE_SHA} - Starting commit
  • {HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit
  • {DIFF_FILE} - Review package path printed by review-package (optional; fill with none if you didn't build one — the reviewer then fetches the diff itself)
  • {DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary

Read the full file on GitHub · 160 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 160 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A ac894d0f23ad

Subscribe to this mod's changes

requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository strigov/superpowers-strigov-ver (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,607 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.