connect-required-verification-information

connect-required-verification-information is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from stripe/ai. It costs 80 tokens per session (6,327 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guided workflow for finding which information a Stripe Connect connected account must provide for onboarding and identity checks. Stripe Connect lets a platform accept payments or provide services through separate seller or service-provider accounts.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to retrieve verification requirements for a connected account, compare setups, and determine which information or documents must be collected.
Why use it?
It helps compare required fields, documents, and business details for different account setups and regions. The requirements depend on choices such as the platform country, account country, and requested capabilities.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex ✓ vendor

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

not rated 1.8krepo +5 today A scan Socket: passSnyk: warnSkillSpector: warn 80 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to retrieve verification requirements for a connected account, compare setups, and determine which information or documents must be collected.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/stripe/ai/connect-required-verification-information
About the project

Stripe AI is a collection of SDKs, tools, an MCP server, and agent skills for building AI products and businesses with Stripe's billing infrastructure. Developers use it to connect Stripe payments and metering to language models and agent frameworks, while the catalogue entries provide Stripe-specific skills, commands, plugins, and agent integrations.

stripe/ai · 1,795 stars · on GitHub · docs.stripe.com

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add stripe/ai --skill connect-required-verification-information
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stripe/ai

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for connect-required-verification-information

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stripe/ai/connect-required-verification-information/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/stripe/ai/connect-required-verification-information)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stripe/ai/connect-required-verification-information"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stripe/ai/connect-required-verification-information/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for connect-required-verification-information

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/stripe/ai/connect-required-verification-information"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/stripe/ai/connect-required-verification-information.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 80 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 6,327 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • Socket pass 14 Aug 2026
  • Snyk warn 14 Aug 2026
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high YARA Match · line 34
    YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).
    Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00080 $0.06327
Opus 5 $0.00040 $0.03164
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.01265
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00633

Measured 10d ago against content hash a9c30050a332, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

connect-required-verification-information scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

### curl examples
providers/agent-plugins/plugin/skills/connect-required-verification-information/SKILL.md · 413 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 413 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Instructions

The human-accessible version of this documentation allows the user to select connected account fields and regions using a form, and then makes API requests to fetch and display the requirements a connected account with the selected configuration and region must provide. Follow these instructions to fetch the same information.

Interaction contract

Terminology used in this document:

  • field: a setup input such as platformCountry, accountCountry, or capabilities
  • option: a presented selectable option for a field
  • value: the option the user selects, or the free-response value the user provides for a field

Every time you ask the user to provide a value for a field:

  • use a multiple-choice question; never stop at a plain free-form prompt or wait for raw chat input
  • if you need free user input, instruct the user to use the question’s free-response field
  • for long option lists, explicitly say that any value from the full validated list is still accepted through the free-response field
  • if the user already provided a valid answer in an earlier message, use that instead of asking again

Hard rules

You must follow these rules:

  • Ask for a field only after all of its prerequisite fields are satisfied.
  • Collect setup fields progressively as the flow advances.
  • Ask for one field at a time, or one group of fields only when they are dependency-free at that point in the flow.
    • For example, ask for platformCountry and accountCountry separately: the platform country determines which account countries are valid, so asking both together can produce invalid combinations. But you may ask for dashboardType, tosType, and legalEntityType together in one group because their valid options are already known from the same response.
  • If there is ever a conflict between the user’s request and the validated setup, inform the user of the conflict and ask them to revise their setup choices using the Interaction contract. Keep the validated setup aligned with what the user requested without silently dropping the conflict.
  • Follow the Interaction contract for every user question.
  • When the number of available options exceeds four, always print the full validated reference list before asking the multiple-choice question so the user can see the full option space.
    • When printing countries, always print the full country name followed by its code in parentheses, for example, Germany (DE).
    • In the multiple-choice question, include a small set of suggested options so the user can move forward with immediate clarity. The reference list above remains the authoritative full set.
    • Leave the descriptions for the country suggested options blank.
  • For any field with four or fewer valid options, show every valid option directly in the multiple-choice question. Do not print a separate reference list first.
  • Every list of selectable options shown to the user must be pre-validated against all currently known constraints before you display it.
  • Never display an option as selectable if you already know it will be removed, rejected, or auto-adjusted later in the flow.
    • Present options that stay valid through the current flow.
  • Ask about capabilities after platformCountry, accountCountry, and the downstream validity constraints for that setup are resolved.
  • Only ask about orrProgram when it is present in the public programs returned for the validated setup.
  • If the businessStructure map for the chosen legalEntityType is empty or contains exactly one key nil, skip businessStructure. Otherwise, ask for businessStructure and always allow a none option or leave unselected as a suggested option in the multiple-choice question.
  • If the user decides to change an earlier choice like platformCountry, you must invalidate and re-check all downstream fields before continuing.
  • Keep the dependency chain implicit. Share the information the user needs to make progress and keep the experience simple.
  • Use external-facing language when talking to the user. See below to translate the internal API terminology.

Read the full file on GitHub · 413 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 413 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A a9c30050a332

Subscribe to this mod's changes

connect-required-verification-information is a skill published in the GitHub repository stripe/ai (1,795 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 6,327 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.