flutter-template: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/pr-review/SKILL.md

pr-review is a skill for Claude Code from strvcom/flutter-template. It costs 65 tokens per session (1,870 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review workflow for pull requests, branch differences, commits, and uncommitted changes in Flutter projects. A pull request is a proposed set of code changes for review before merging.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps select the right Git comparison, read project guidance and changed files, and audit changes for defects, behavior changes, test gaps, and upgrade risks.
Why use it?
It focuses review on bugs, regressions, broken assumptions, missing tests, architecture mismatches, and release risks instead of only checking formatting.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions AGENTS.md.

This is strvcom/flutter-template's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on flutter-template itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything flutter-template configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to strvcom/flutter-template. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/strvcom/flutter-template/master/.agents/skills/pr-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/strvcom/flutter-template

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pr-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/strvcom/flutter-template/pr-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/strvcom/flutter-template/pr-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/strvcom/flutter-template/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/strvcom/flutter-template/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pr-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/strvcom/flutter-template/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/strvcom/flutter-template/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 65 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,870 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00065 $0.01870
Opus 5.5 $0.00026 $0.00748
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00374
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00187

Measured 2mo ago against content hash db248cd04341, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/pr-review/SKILL.md · 183 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Flutter Template PR Review

Use this skill when reviewing a pull request, branch diff, or a set of code changes in this repository.

Review Goal

Prioritize finding:

  • bugs
  • regressions
  • broken assumptions
  • architecture drift
  • missing tests
  • upgrade or release risks

Do not treat the review as a style-polish exercise unless the user asks for that explicitly.

Read First

  • AGENTS.md
  • docs/PROJECT_OVERVIEW.md
  • docs/PROJECT_GUIDELINES.md
  • any changed files

Determine Review Scope

Parse the user's request and choose the smallest matching diff scope.

User asks for Review scope
default, branch review, PR review git diff <default_branch>...HEAD
uncommitted changes git diff plus git diff --cached
a specific commit git show <commit>
last N commits git diff HEAD~N...HEAD
branch X vs Y git diff X...Y
explicit commit range git diff <range>

Detect the default branch with:

git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD | sed 's|refs/remotes/origin/||'

If that fails, try main, then master.

Gather:

git diff --name-status <range>
git diff --stat <range>
git diff --unified=5 <range>

For uncommitted reviews, gather both unstaged and staged diffs. If there are no changes, say so and stop. If there are more than 50 changed files, warn that it is a large review and ask whether to proceed or narrow the scope.

Classify Changed Files

Classify every non-deleted changed file before reviewing so the right standards are applied. A file can belong to multiple categories.

Category File patterns Review focus
Feature UI lib/features/**/**_page.dart, lib/features/**/**_page_content.dart page thinness, shared widgets, localization, theme extensions, user-facing states
Feature state lib/features/**/**_state.dart, lib/features/**/**_event.dart Riverpod orchestration, async gaps, freezed unions, one-off events
Navigation lib/app/navigation/**, changed @RoutePage() widgets AutoRoute registration, generated route expectations, deep-link or shell behavior
Data and entities lib/common/data/dto/**, lib/common/data/entity/**, lib/common/data/enum/** DTO/entity separation, JSON/freezed annotations, resilient mapping
Use cases and providers lib/common/usecase/**, lib/common/provider/**, lib/core/** IO boundaries, provider lifetimes, startup assumptions, service wiring
Theme and shared UI lib/app/theme/**, lib/common/component/**, lib/common/composition/** reuse, accessibility, edge-to-edge/system bar behavior, visual consistency
Localization and assets assets/localization/**, pubspec.yaml, asset inputs generated accessors, context.locale, make gen expectations
Tests test/**, integration_test/** coverage quality, realistic assertions, Patrol vs widget-test boundaries
Platform files android/**, ios/**, web/**, macos/**, linux/**, windows/** flavor config, Firebase, signing, native build risks
Release and CI .github/**, makefile, release_notes.txt, .fvmrc, pubspec.yaml version alignment, workflow blast radius, release sequencing
Migration reference imported Kotlin/Swift/KMP files, migration notes, copied source snippets behavior parity only; do not require KMP/iOS style rules in Flutter code

Read the full file on GitHub · 183 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 183 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A db248cd04341

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository strvcom/flutter-template (24 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 1,870 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

pr-review compared with skills from other repositories

pr-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
pr-reviewstrvcom/flutter-templateSkill244mo agoMITA65Claude Code
autoreviewopenclaw/clawhubSkill9.5kyesterdayMITA17Claude Code, Codex
agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skillsSkill2.2k6d agoMITA115Claude Code, Codex
omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermesSkill5.2kyesterdayMITA48Claude Code, Codex
revdiff-planumputun/revdiffSkill945yesterdayMITA84Claude Code
explore-unknownsdzhng/skillsSkill1.4k2d agoMITA162Claude Code, Codex
re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthinSkill1.4k4d agoMITA70Claude Code