Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/styfinity/linkedin-engine/linkedin-icp-definernpx skills add styfinity/linkedin-engine --skill linkedin-icp-definergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/styfinity/linkedin-engineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/styfinity/linkedin-engine/linkedin-icp-definer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/styfinity/linkedin-engine/linkedin-icp-definer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/styfinity/linkedin-engine/linkedin-icp-definer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00559 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
linkedin-icp-definer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 31 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LinkedIn ICP Definer
Your ICP is not who you wish bought from you. It is who actually does. This skill reads the evidence, names the disqualifiers out loud, and locks it into the brief so every other skill scores against the same target.
Inputs
- Won and lost notes, descriptions of your best clients, and who you do NOT want: $ARGUMENTS
- The brief (offer, pains, voice) loads automatically. If the offer section is thin, fixing it is the first thing to flag.
Do this
- Derive the ICP from the evidence, not from aspiration. From the won notes, pull the pattern: title, seniority, company size, industry, and the trigger that made them buy (the event or pain that started the conversation).
- Cross-check the lost notes. If a profile shape keeps losing, it is a disqualifier, not a stretch target. Say so.
- Write explicit disqualifiers. Name the titles, company sizes, stages, or situations that look close but never convert. Be specific enough that a person could be ruled out in five seconds.
- List the 2 or 3 buying signals that mark a live one right now (a hiring post, a funding event, a role change, a public complaint about the exact pain the offer solves).
- Phrase every line so the other skills can score against it. Concrete attributes, not adjectives.
Output
A ready-to-paste "## ICP" block for linkedin-brief.md, with three labelled parts: Fit criteria (title, seniority, company size, industry, buying trigger), Disqualifiers (explicit, ruled-out shapes), and Buying signals (the 2 or 3 live markers). Hand it back ready to drop straight into the brief.
Rules
- ICP from evidence, not aspiration. If a claim is not backed by a won or lost note, mark it an assumption to test, not a fact.
- Name disqualifiers explicitly. A target with no disqualifiers is not defined yet.
- Every attribute must be something a sibling skill can score against. No vague adjectives.
- No em-dashes. Use a comma, a period, or " - ".
- This writes to the brief but does not send anything. It only shapes who the outreach skills aim at.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 31 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 45d595fffb43
linkedin-icp-definer is a skill published in the GitHub repository styfinity/linkedin-engine (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 559 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
LinkedIn Automation
Automate LinkedIn marketing, lead generation, content publishing, and professional networking.
lemlist-campaign-from-icp
Use when the user says "create a lemlist campaign for X", "build a lemlist campaign from this ICP", "spin a lemlist campaign for Y", "ICP to lemlist", "natural language to lemlist campaign", "draft a lemlist campaign", "lemlist campaign for VPs/Managers/ICs at Z", or any variant indicating they want to turn a…
campaign-strategy
Pre-flight strategy advisor for a new campaign. Analyses every past campaign in the local YALC DB (HeyReach campaigns auto-sync on each run), their real outbound copy, where in the sequence each conversation first replied, every prior retro brief, and the validated/proven intelligence file. Then it proposes angle…
copywriting-follow-up
Writes follow-up cold emails after no reply from a prospect. Use this skill whenever the user wants to follow up on an email that got no response, says "write a follow-up", "they didn't reply, what do I send?", "draft a bump email", "write email 2 or 3 of my sequence", or asks how to re-engage a cold prospect. Works…
copywriting-ic-sequence
Writes a 3-email outbound sequence targeting Individual Contributors (SDR, AE, BDR, Account Manager, Marketing Specialist, Sales Rep, RevOps Analyst, CS Rep, etc.). Use this skill whenever the user wants to write cold emails for an IC, says "write me a sequence for SDRs", "draft emails targeting AEs", "emails for…
copywriting-manager-sequence
Writes a 3-email outbound sequence targeting Manager-level buyers (Sales Manager, Marketing Manager, RevOps Manager, Team Lead, Operations Manager, etc.). Use this skill whenever the user wants to write cold emails for a Manager, says "write me a sequence for a Sales Manager", "draft emails targeting managers", or…