Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/subhansh-dev/agent-maxxing/performance-patternsnpx skills add subhansh-dev/agent-maxxing --skill performance-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/subhansh-dev/agent-maxxingWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00477 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00238 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
performance-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Performance Patterns
Frontend Performance
Lazy Loading
const HeavyComponent = lazy(() => import('./HeavyComponent'))
Load components only when needed. Use for routes, modals, below-fold content.
Memoization
const memoizedValue = useMemo(() => computeExpensiveValue(a, b), [a, b])
const memoizedFn = useCallback(() => doSomething(a, b), [a, b])
Cache expensive computations and function references.
Code Splitting
Split your bundle by route or feature. Users only download what they need.
Image Optimization
- Use WebP/AVIF formats
- Lazy load below-fold images
- Use responsive images (srcset)
- Compress images (tinyPNG, Sharp)
CSS Performance
- Use
transformandopacityfor animations (GPU-accelerated) - Avoid
layouttriggers (width, height, margin, padding) - Use
will-changesparingly - Minimize repaints with
contain
Backend Performance
Caching
- Cache database queries (Redis, in-memory)
- Cache API responses (HTTP caching headers)
- Cache expensive computations (memoization)
- Cache rendered pages (SSR cache)
Database Optimization
- Add indexes for frequent queries
- Use connection pooling
- Batch inserts/updates
- Avoid N+1 queries
- Use EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Async Operations
- Don't block the event loop
- Use worker threads for CPU-intensive tasks
- Stream large responses
- Queue background jobs
Measurement
- Lighthouse — overall performance score
- Core Web Vitals — LCP, FID, CLS
- Chrome DevTools — Performance tab, Lighthouse tab
- webpack-bundle-analyzer — bundle size visualization
- ab / wrk — load testing
Common Anti-Patterns
- Loading everything upfront
- Not caching expensive operations
- Synchronous database calls in loops
- Large bundle sizes (no code splitting)
- Unoptimized images (no lazy loading, wrong format)
- Layout thrashing (reading layout then writing)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 75 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A c05b69547b42
performance-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository subhansh-dev/agent-maxxing (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 477 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
visual-acceptance
UI/视觉改动交付前的终验方法论——多主题截图矩阵复现、像素真值判据链、CSS 层叠陷阱、布局漂移审查、before/after 存证。当视觉改动需要验收(而非实现)时使用:交付前最后一环,回答「看得见的部分真的对吗」。.
frame-bold-poster
A 1970s European editorial poster in motion — a red rule draws across, a giant tilted figure drops in, a three-line headline rises line-by-line, an italic serif standfirst fades.
frame-build-minimal
Luxury-minimal whitespace hero — single word reveals letter by letter, warm-gold hairline, breathing indicators.
frame-creative-voltage
Electric split with hand-drawn script — offset panels slide in, display title rises with an outlined word, script strokes itself in.
frame-data-chart-nyt
NYT-newsroom typography, staggered reveal animation, and editorial-grade charts (line, bar, or range band).
frame-takram-organic
Soft-tech radial node graph as art — frosted rounded card, curved links drawing in, nodes popping outward, gentle float.