Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add subhansh-dev/agent-maxxing --skill tooltipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/subhansh-dev/agent-maxxingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/subhansh-dev/agent-maxxing/tooltip)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/subhansh-dev/agent-maxxing/tooltip"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/subhansh-dev/agent-maxxing/tooltip/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/subhansh-dev/agent-maxxing/tooltip"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/subhansh-dev/agent-maxxing/tooltip.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00334 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00134 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
tooltip scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Tooltip Component
.tooltip-wrapper {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
}
.tooltip {
position: absolute;
bottom: calc(100% + 8px);
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%) translateY(4px);
padding: 6px 12px;
background: rgba(16, 18, 30, 0.95);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 8px;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.85);
font-size: 12px;
white-space: nowrap;
pointer-events: none;
opacity: 0;
transition: all 0.15s ease;
z-index: 1000;
}
.tooltip::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
border: 5px solid transparent;
border-top-color: rgba(16, 18, 30, 0.95);
}
.tooltip-wrapper:hover .tooltip {
opacity: 1;
transform: translateX(-50%) translateY(0);
}
Rules:
- Delay 300ms before showing (prevents flicker)
- Smart position: flip if too close to viewport edge
- Max-width 200px for long text, allow wrapping
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 52 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 36d98d18d8de
tooltip is a skill published in the GitHub repository subhansh-dev/agent-maxxing (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 334 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
gh-find-prs
Survey open Codewhale PRs and triage each for mergeability and disposition against the real landing branch.
review
Diff-scoped correctness review that reads the codebase around the change — callers, contracts, and invariants — and returns line-anchored findings ranked by severity with confidence, then a merge-risk verdict. Use for reviewing a PR, diff, or named change set. Not for style review, approvals-as-rubber-stamp, or…
simplify
Review recent code changes for reuse, code quality, and efficiency, then directly apply straightforward cleanup improvements. Use when the user wants a post-implementation cleanup pass, pre-PR polish, or asks to simplify/refine recent changes. Invoke with /simplify or /simplify .
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
review-this-branch
Run the nohuman review gate (fresh-session adversarial reviewer + tamper guard) over the current branch or a GitHub pull request, with no server, no database, and no onboarding, and relay the pass/fail checklist.
fabric-spec
Starts a persistent Pi Fabric spec supervisor that audits the main session against a feature design spec and steers only when a requirement lacks verified evidence. Use for strict, unblocked spec compliance while the main agent keeps full freedom to orchestrate.