openspec-plus-proposal

openspec-plus-proposal is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from sudokar/openspec-plus. It costs 82 tokens per session (2,827 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guided process for creating or refining an OpenSpec proposal, a short description of why a change is needed and what it should accomplish.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it during OpenSpec proposal work, including new proposals, continued proposals, exploration, review, and refinement.
Why use it?
It helps clarify the intended change before technical design or implementation begins and checks that the proposal stays within scope.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions subagents; mentions Claude Code.

Good fit Use it during OpenSpec proposal work, including new proposals, continued proposals, exploration, review, and refinement.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sudokar/openspec-plus/openspec-plus-proposal
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add sudokar/openspec-plus --skill openspec-plus-proposal
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sudokar/openspec-plus

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for openspec-plus-proposal

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sudokar/openspec-plus/openspec-plus-proposal/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sudokar/openspec-plus/openspec-plus-proposal)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sudokar/openspec-plus/openspec-plus-proposal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sudokar/openspec-plus/openspec-plus-proposal/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for openspec-plus-proposal

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sudokar/openspec-plus/openspec-plus-proposal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sudokar/openspec-plus/openspec-plus-proposal.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 82 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,827 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 67
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 122
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00082 $0.02827
Opus 5.5 $0.00033 $0.01131
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00565
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00283

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 186ef8fcc682, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

openspec-plus-proposal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/openspec-plus-proposal/SKILL.md · 221 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

OpenSpec Plus Proposal

Mission

Brainstorming-style interactive discovery for OpenSpec proposals. Produce a lean Why / What Changes / Capabilities / Impact proposal at intent level — never sliding into design, spec, or implementation.

OpenSpec provides the format and template (resolved dynamically in Phase 0). This skill provides the process discipline: five-lens Q&A, decomposition check, scope discipline, subagent review.


Inputs

  • User request — authoritative for intent
  • Existing proposals in openspec/changes/ — for terminology and convention only
  • NEVER read source code — proposal is intent, not implementation grounding

Workflow

Four phases. NEVER skip, merge, or reorder.

Phase -1: Auto-Update Check (once per session)
Phase 0: Schema & Template Resolution
Phase 1: Interactive Discovery (5-lens Q&A)
Phase 2: Write & Artifact Compliance Review

Workflow Visibility (MANDATORY)

Display workflow phases via task tool at start; update as each phase completes.


Core Principles

  • Understand Before Defining — seek the problem before describing the change; never jump to proposed solutions.
  • Goals Before Solutions — solution language ("add Redis", "use Postgres") → redirect to the underlying problem and goal.
  • Scope Boundaries Are Critical — non-goals as deliberate as in-scope items; strong non-goals reduce future scope creep.
  • YAGNI — No Speculative Scope — every scope item traces to a stated user need or stakeholder concern.
  • Respect Project Standards — read project instruction files (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, equivalents) at Phase 1 start; use project terminology; conflicts → surface to user, never silently override.

Phase -1: Auto-Update Check (MANDATORY — once per session)

Run FIRST, before Phase 0. Skip if already run this session.

  1. Read openspec/.plus/config.yaml:
    • settings.autoUpdateCheck is false → skip Phase -1 entirely, proceed to Phase 0
    • Missing/unreadable, or not false → continue
  2. Read openspec/.plus/last-update-check:
    • File exists AND timestamp is within 7 days of today → skip immediately, proceed to Phase 0
    • Missing or older than 7 days → continue:
      • Fetch https://api.github.com/repos/sudokar/openspec-plus/releases/latest (single JSON object). Read the tag_name field and strip the leading v if present. This is the remote version.
      • Compare remote version with openspec/.plus/VERSION (local)
      • If remote > local → prompt the user using the question tool:

        🔔 OpenSpec Plus v{remote} is available (you have v{local}).

        • Option 1: Upgrade (Recommended)
        • Option 2: Upgrade later
        • If user selects Upgrade → display the install/update link: https://github.com/sudokar/openspec-plus#-install--update and STOP. Do NOT continue to Phase 0 — the user should run the install/update prompt first and restart the session.
        • If user selects Upgrade later → proceed to Phase 0 normally.
      • Write current timestamp to openspec/.plus/last-update-check
  3. Network/file errors → silently continue. NEVER block the workflow for network issues — proceed to Phase 0.

Read the full file on GitHub · 221 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 186ef8fcc682
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 219 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 792016f76c15

Subscribe to this mod's changes

openspec-plus-proposal is a skill published in the GitHub repository sudokar/openspec-plus (214 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 2,827 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

ai-code-generation-guardrails

Use when reviewing AI-generated code before merge or execution: plan AST/security checks, isolated behavior tests and evidence, with language-specific coverage limits.

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills · 35 tokens

implement-type-annotations

Add comprehensive type hints to Python/TypeScript code to improve IDE support, catch errors early, and enable better AI code understanding.

ambient-code/agentready · 30 tokens

pr-review

Review a GitHub pull request and post one formal review — advance the existing discussion and give precision-first, high-signal feedback. Judgement on the diff, not a build gate — CI validates that it builds, and a targeted probe is allowed as evidence. Use when asked to review a PR or on a cron PR scan.

nearform/lastlight · 69 tokens

tech-writing

Write professional technical documents — requirements/PRD, tech spec/design doc, low-level design, decision records, and trade-off analysis — at a formality tier matched to the task. Grounds every claim in real code or a cited source, marks what it could not verify, and refuses to pad. Use when asked to write/update a…

nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog · 88 tokens

plan-orchestrator

Route hierarchical-planning intents to the correct backing script. Use when the user invokes /aura-frog:plan (with or without subcommand), mentions plan verbs (expand/next/replan/promote/archive/freeze/thaw/undo/status/conflicts), or types a plan-vocabulary bare word with .claude/plans/active.json present. Owns verb…

nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog · 91 tokens

perf-profiling

Systematic performance profiling and optimization across frontend (Core Web Vitals, code splitting, lazy loading), backend (N+1 queries, async), and database (EXPLAIN ANALYZE, indexing) layers. Use when the user reports slow code, latency, memory leaks, needs to benchmark, or wants to speed up an application. Measure…

nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog · 107 tokens