Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sungurerdim/dev-skills --skill ds-repogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sungurerdim/dev-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-repo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-repo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-repo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-repo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sungurerdim/dev-skills/ds-repo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.03735 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01868 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00747 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00374 |
Grade A, and why
ds-repo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 215 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/ds-repo
Unprotected main branches, stale branches piling up, missing CODEOWNERS, no branch policies — most repos are misconfigured from day one. This skill audits and fixes it.
Repository Health — Audit and configure repo settings, branch policies, hygiene, metadata, team, and structure.
Completion Evidence — applies to every phase: Report
done/OKonly with the machine-checkable evidence the gates name — the exact command run and its observed output (orfile:linediff). Missing evidence → reportINCOMPLETEplus what is missing. Self-assessment is never evidence. (This band repeats at file end by design — both copies are normative.)
Triggers
- User runs
/ds-repo - User asks to audit or configure repo settings, branch protection, or CODEOWNERS
- User asks about stale branches, repo hygiene, or team structure
- User asks to set up a new repository or fix repo configuration
Triggers — INVOKE / DON'T INVOKE
| INVOKE | DON'T INVOKE |
|---|---|
| "audit repo settings", "set up branch protection" | "audit code quality inside the repo" (→ ds-review) |
| "configure CODEOWNERS, OSS-ready files" | "license / regulatory research" (→ ds-research) |
| "clean up stale / merged branches" | "tidy commit history of a branch" (→ ds-pr --tidy) |
| "configure squash-only merge + delete-on-merge" | "audit CI workflows" (→ ds-devops) |
Contract
Dimensions: B4 (contributor), D8
- Only manages repository settings and structure — not code quality.
- Every recommendation cites a specific setting or file.
- Standalone. Uses blueprint profile when available;
ds/audit/findings.mdonly when fresh (git_hash == HEADAND current run-cycle); own analysis otherwise. - Full accounting enforced: every finding and planned check ends in an explicit disposition (fixed / skipped + reason / only you can do); summary totals balance.
- Pre-existing / out-of-scope errors detected during work are NOT skipped — fixed inline or escalated with concrete blocker.
- State-exempt: audit is regenerable; generated configs/fixes land in the working tree — git is the durable record.
- publish/irreversible exception-list extension: repo visibility changes (public↔private) and admin/permission changes are added to the exception list, citing "a business/legal decision not inferable from the repo" — these always resolve
only you can do, never applied blind, whether or not--askis set.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -50 lines d539315696e5
- 10d ago First seen · 265 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A c93e5a2e67b7
ds-repo is a skill published in the GitHub repository sungurerdim/dev-skills (1 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 3,735 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ring:committing-changes
Commit changes with scope allowlist enforcement, atomic grouping, GPG-signed conventional commits, and trailer management. Detects the repo's PR-validation scope policy before proposing any message. Use when the user asks to commit or has changes ready to record. Skip when the working tree is clean or the user wants…
ring:opening-pull-requests
Open a GitHub Pull Request with automatic base branch detection, scope allowlist enforcement, PR template filling, and post-create base verification. Replaces ring:generating-pr-descriptions. Use after pushing a branch when ready to open a PR. Skip if the branch is not yet pushed or there are uncommitted changes …
ring:shipping-changes
End-to-end git orchestrator: branch → commit → push → PR, with a full plan presented before any execution. Detects base branch and scope allowlist once and propagates to all phases. Use when ready to ship a complete unit of work. Skip if only one phase is needed: commit-only → ring:committing-changes, PR-only →…
ring:generating-pr-descriptions
Generating pull request descriptions from git branch changes with automatic title generation, change-type detection, and smart analysis. Uses branch-only scope to avoid full history analysis. Use when preparing a PR for review. Skip when the PR is a single trivial commit or description already exists.
ring:generating-release-guides
Generating an internal Operations-facing update/migration guide from the git diff between two refs, documenting per-change client impact, deploy ordering, monitoring, and rollback notes in English, pt-br, or both. Use when preparing a version release or recording what changed for the Ops team. Runs read-only by…
ring:cleaning-comments
Cleaning redundant and obvious comments following clean code principles while preserving meaningful documentation. Supports git scope filtering (staged, unstaged, branch, commit-range). Use when code has excessive comments, during code review, or post-refactor cleanup. Skip when reviewing documentation files or…