Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add surajssd/dotfiles --skill pr-review-dashboardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/surajssd/dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/surajssd/dotfiles/pr-review-dashboard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/surajssd/dotfiles/pr-review-dashboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/surajssd/dotfiles/pr-review-dashboard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/surajssd/dotfiles/pr-review-dashboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/surajssd/dotfiles/pr-review-dashboard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00112 | $0.02853 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.01426 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00571 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00285 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review-dashboard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Review Dashboard
Act as a staff-level code reviewer. Produce a decision aid that helps an unfamiliar reviewer understand the change, verify its safety, and know what to do next.
Put correctness, evidence, and actionable findings ahead of visual quantity. Use diagrams to compress relationships that prose cannot; do not use them as decoration. Do not modify the reviewed code, submit a GitHub review, or post comments unless the user explicitly asks.
Read references/review-method.md completely before evaluating the change. For any non-trivial PR, also read references/diagram-selection.md completely before choosing visualizations.
1. Establish the review boundary
Run from the repository root and capture the local state before reviewing:
ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel) || exit 1
cd "$ROOT"
CURRENT=$(git symbolic-ref --quiet --short HEAD || true)
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
git status --short
Stop if CURRENT is empty: a detached HEAD does not identify a feature branch reliably. Record any working-tree changes. Review only committed $BASE...HEAD changes unless the user explicitly includes local changes; never silently attribute unrelated uncommitted work to the PR.
Discover and read applicable repository guidance before judging the code. Check root and changed-path scopes for AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING*, review guides, architecture docs, test instructions, and language-specific conventions. Prefer rg --files for discovery.
Fetch remote refs on a best-effort basis:
git fetch origin --quiet
If fetching fails, continue only when a usable local base ref exists. Disclose that remote freshness was not verified.
2. Resolve the PR and its actual base before diffing
Resolve author intent and the target branch before gathering the diff. A PR may target develop, a release branch, or another non-default branch; the repository default is only a fallback.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 197 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A 825f216116eb
pr-review-dashboard is a skill published in the GitHub repository surajssd/dotfiles (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 2,853 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…