Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sutchan/Agent-Skills-Hub --skill redesign-existing-projectsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sutchan/Agent-Skills-HubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/redesign-existing-projects)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/redesign-existing-projects"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/redesign-existing-projects/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/redesign-existing-projects"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sutchan/agent-skills-hub/redesign-existing-projects.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00179 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00072 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00036 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
redesign-existing-projects scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to redesign-existing-projects — 179 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Redesign (retired)
This skill is retired. Redesigns, restyles and reviews of existing pages and app screens are part of design-taste-frontend, which audits the existing page in a real browser first, keeps its content and working behaviour, and then rebuilds the design to a dealt direction with before-and-after screenshots.
If you were called by name, follow the design-taste-frontend skill (its "Redesign or review" route). If it is not installed:
npx skills add https://github.com/Leonxlnx/taste-skill --skill "design-taste-frontend"
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -170 lines · +1 tokens per session 3a71d603c4b4
- 8d ago Changed · +3 lines 44c7ed9e6bd2
- 19d ago Changed · +1 lines ff8aa33bd79a
- 1mo ago First seen · 182 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 24afec32618f
redesign-existing-projects is a skill published in the GitHub repository sutchan/Agent-Skills-Hub (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 179 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to redesign-existing-projects, differing in 179 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
frontend-ui-engineering
Build production-quality, accessible, non-generic-looking UI components and pages — component composition, the state-management ladder (local to global), avoiding the recognizable "AI aesthetic," WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility, and responsive/loading/empty states. Use when building or modifying user-facing interfaces, or…
ai-design-slop-audit
This skill should be used when the user wants an evidence-backed review of an existing UI for generic "AI-generated" design defaults — asking to "audit this design", "why does this look AI-generated", "review this for design slop", or wants a removal-first cleanup plan without a speculative redesign. Point-in-time…
animation-improvement-planning
This skill should be used when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion across the app", "make this feel better" without a specific diff to review, or wants a prioritized roadmap of animation fixes rather than a single verdict. Surveys a codebase's motion, produces a severity-ranked findings table…
animation-opportunity-scan
This skill should be used when the user asks "what could be animated here?", "where should we add motion?", or wants the interface to "feel more alive" without saying what to change. Read-only sweep of a codebase or UI for moments that would genuinely benefit from motion, gated by frequency/purpose/duration/function…
frontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
playground
Creates interactive HTML playgrounds — self-contained single-file explorers that let users configure something visually through controls, see a live preview, and copy out a prompt. Use when the user asks to make a playground, explorer, or interactive tool for a topic.