ai-visibility-prompt-research

ai-visibility-prompt-research is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from swan-gtm/gtm-skills. It costs 184 tokens per session (1,015 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research process for creating the questions used to monitor whether a brand appears in AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity.

In plain words
What is it for?
Collecting buyer wording from search results, communities, forums, question-and-answer sites, comparison pages, and sales conversations, then organising prompts for monitoring.
Why use it?
It helps teams measure visibility against the questions real buyers ask instead of only tracking language taken from the brand’s own marketing.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Collecting buyer wording from search results, communities, forums, question-and-answer sites, comparison pages, and sales conversations, then organising prompts for monitoring.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/ai-visibility-prompt-research
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add swan-gtm/gtm-skills --skill ai-visibility-prompt-research
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/swan-gtm/gtm-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ai-visibility-prompt-research

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/ai-visibility-prompt-research/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/ai-visibility-prompt-research)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/ai-visibility-prompt-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/ai-visibility-prompt-research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ai-visibility-prompt-research

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/ai-visibility-prompt-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/ai-visibility-prompt-research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 184 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,015 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00184 $0.01015
Opus 5.5 $0.00074 $0.00406
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00037 $0.00203
Haiku 4.5 $0.00018 $0.00102

Measured 1mo ago against content hash a94378da3d0e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ai-visibility-prompt-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/elad-hefetz/ai-visibility-prompt-research/SKILL.md · 46 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

AI visibility prompt research

A monitoring prompt set decides what you can even see. Anchor it on the brand's own marketing copy and you measure prompts nobody searches; anchor it on real market demand and you measure whether the brand wins the questions buyers actually ask an assistant. The whole discipline is holding the brand back until the end so the research stays grounded in the market.

The play

  1. Frame — no brand yet. Collect the category (plain description, no brand name), the named competitor set, the target regions and their languages, and which assistants you'll monitor. Say up front that you're withholding the brand on purpose.
  2. Harvest category language, brand last. Pull real buyer phrasing from three wells: keyword and category terminology (ask for any existing keyword or targeting file, then expand from the open web); real questions and pain points mined from communities, forums, Q&A, and "alternatives / best-of" comparison content; and — asked after the open-web pass — first-party sales-call and pre-sales transcripts, the highest-signal source. Tag every item with honest provenance. (See references/open-web-sourcing.md.)
  3. Synthesize personas and the non-branded prompt set. Merge all signals into 4–7 personas with their pain points and the solutions they seek, in category terms. Map each to an awareness stage, weighting consideration and decision over pure curiosity. Cluster into a handful of topics. Write each prompt the way a real buyer asks an assistant — a genuine question, not a keyword string — in the target region's language (translate, don't just localize).
  4. Brand pass — last, and isolated. Only now introduce the brand. Add competitive comparisons, "alternatives to", pricing, and fit questions as their own dedicated branded topic, flagged branded, kept separate from the category topics.
  5. Assemble, validate, hand off. Build one file to your platform's importer contract, validate it (valid enums, one language per row matching its regions, no duplicates, sane per-topic and per-engine spread), show the distributions, and hand it to the user to upload. Never auto-import. (See references/prompt-file-contract.md.)

Read the full file on GitHub · 46 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 184 tokens per session scan A a94378da3d0e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ai-visibility-prompt-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository swan-gtm/gtm-skills (221 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 184 tokens to every session and 1,015 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.