Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add swan-gtm/gtm-skills --skill personalization-hooksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/swan-gtm/gtm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/personalization-hooks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/personalization-hooks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/personalization-hooks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/personalization-hooks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/swan-gtm/gtm-skills/personalization-hooks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00695 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00347 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
personalization-hooks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Personalization Hooks to Relevance
Strong Hook (Verbatim Tie)
Direct quote or reference from their content.
Pattern:
"In your recent [content type] about [topic], you mentioned [direct quote]..."
Examples:
In your recent post about SDR burnout, you mentioned "the biggest issue is lack of quality leads"...
In your podcast episode on scaling sales, you said "we struggled with pipeline predictability until..."
Your article on RevOps made a point about "data silos killing deal velocity"...
When to use:
- High-value prospects
- Enterprise accounts
- When you have strong content to reference
Lite Hook (Conceptual Tie)
Reference the theme/topic without direct quote.
Pattern:
"I noticed you're focused on [theme/topic]..."
Examples:
I noticed you're focused on scaling your SDR team...
Saw you've been posting about RevOps challenges...
Looks like pipeline predictability is a priority for you...
When to use:
- Higher volume outreach
- When content isn't quotable
- Time-constrained personalization
Hook Selection Framework
| Situation | Hook Type | Effort |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise $100K+ deal | Strong Hook | High |
| Mid-market $25-100K | Either | Medium |
| SMB/Volume play | Lite Hook | Low |
| Champion already exists | Lite Hook | Low |
| Competitive displacement | Strong Hook | High |
Hook Integration Examples
Strong Hook + Relevance:
In your recent post about outbound being "broken," you mentioned cold emails getting <1% reply rates.
We've been helping teams like [similar company] hit 15%+ by focusing on signal-based targeting instead of volume.
Worth comparing notes?
Lite Hook + Relevance:
Noticed you're scaling the BDR team at {{company}}.
Most BDR leaders I talk to are dealing with ramp time and pipeline quality.
We helped [similar company] cut ramp by 40%.
Is that something you're working on?
Combines with
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 123 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 48ab4f6dfab4
personalization-hooks is a skill published in the GitHub repository swan-gtm/gtm-skills (148 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 695 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
news-signal-outreach
End-to-end news-triggered signal composite. Takes any piece of news — an article, LinkedIn post, tweet, announcement, event, trend, regulation, product launch, acquisition, layoff, expansion, or any other public event — and evaluates whether the companies or people mentioned are ICP fits. If yes, identifies the…
champion-move-outreach
End-to-end champion/buyer/user job change signal composite. Takes a set of known people (past buyers, champions, power users), detects when they move to a new company, researches the new company for ICP fit, and drafts personalized outreach leveraging the existing relationship. Tool-agnostic — works with any people…
leadership-change-outreach
End-to-end leadership change signal composite. Takes any set of companies, detects recent leadership changes (new VP+, C-suite hires and promotions), evaluates relevance to your product, and drafts personalized outreach. Uses Apollo People Search (free) for fast detection + Apollo Enrichment (1 credit/person) for…
funding-signal-outreach
End-to-end funding signal composite. Takes any set of companies, detects recent funding events, qualifies against your company context, finds relevant people (buyers, champions, users), and drafts personalized outreach. Tool-agnostic — works with any company source, contact finder, and outreach platform.
hiring-signal-outreach
End-to-end hiring signal composite. Takes any set of companies, detects job postings that your product augments or replaces, finds relevant people (the hiring manager, buyers, champions, users), and drafts personalized outreach using the job role as the hook. Tool-agnostic — works with any company source, job board…
cold-email-outreach
End-to-end cold email outreach orchestration. Handles goal alignment, lead ingestion from any source (CSV, paste, CRM export, database), sequence design, email generation, campaign setup in the user's chosen outreach tool, and launch. Tool-agnostic — supports Smartlead (full MCP automation), Instantly, Lemlist…